Tony Godshall [mutt-users] <17/07/01 15:14 -0700>:
> > > Par is much better, of course ...
>
> > http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/
>
> apt-get --simulate install par
> apt-get install par
cd /usr/ports/textproc/par
make install clean
HTH HAND
--suresh
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + W
> > Par is much better, of course ...
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/
apt-get --simulate install par
apt-get install par
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Par is much better, of course ...
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/
Oh! The wasted reformatting keystrokes!
However have I survived this long without it?
--
On 2001.07.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Biju Chacko [mutt-users] <17/07/01 12:56 +0530>:
> > If you can easily run external programs from it, then look into 'par'.
>
> Or fmt - which, as part of the GNU textutils package you can reaso
Biju Chacko [mutt-users] <17/07/01 12:56 +0530>:
> If you can easily run external programs from it, then look into 'par'.
Or fmt - which, as part of the GNU textutils package you can reasonably expect
to find on most unix systems.
Par is much better, of course ...
-suresh
--
Suresh
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:20:15AM -0700, Chris Fuchs wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning curve.
> >
> >Are you already using vim? No reason to start, just to get word wrap.
> >par (under vi) handles this
Thus spake Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm curious, what's the MUA?
>
> Mail
> User
> Agent
> -> mutt in this case
I think he means what's the one that's mangling the quotes...
-Justin
--
[ ] -- Justin R. Miller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [ ]
[ ] -- see full headers for PGP key infor
So sprach »Sam Roberts« am 2001-07-16 um 13:06:37 -0400 :
> Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> > I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
> > 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
>
> I'm curious, what's the MUA?
Mail
User
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0500, David Champion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 2001.07.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Chris Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
> > >hit 'gq' and it should wrap nicely.
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning curve.
>
>Are you already using vim? No reason to start, just to get word wrap.
>par (under vi) handles this, and I'd be shocked -- shocked, I tell you
>-- if emacs does not.
Sho
On 2001.07.16, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Chris Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
> >hit 'gq' and it should wrap nicely. That's what I do, anyway...
> >
>
> Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning cu
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:15PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>Thus spake Chris Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> Does anyone else get mail thus mutilated and how do you handle it?
>
>Use this in your .muttrc:
>
> set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:>'"
>
>Then, when you'd like to
Thus spake Chris Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Does anyone else get mail thus mutilated and how do you handle it?
Use this in your .muttrc:
set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 comments=nb:>'"
Then, when you'd like to reformat text, highlight it in visual mode and
hit 'gq' and it should wrap
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
>Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
>> I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
>> 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
>
>I'm curious, what's the MUA?
MS Exchange
Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
> 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
I'm curious, what's the MUA?
Sam
--
Sam Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
but for quoted lines you get something like this:
> extreme silliness that should not be dealt this way but is for
whatever reason.
> On t
16 matches
Mail list logo
