Re: [PATCH] more lenient RFC2047 parsing (was Re: RFC2047 Subjects)

2010-09-06 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:27:24PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: I've been running all weekend with this patch. It works for both unencoded "?" and SPACE characters in RFC2047 header lines. I searched my mail corpus for RFC2047 encoded headers (both strictly conformant and non-conformant), and co

Re: [PATCH] more lenient RFC2047 parsing (was Re: RFC2047 Subjects)

2010-09-06 Thread Ed Blackman
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:10:37PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote: On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:20:18PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: I forwarded the message I copied the headers from, along with a one that had spaces in the encoded-text, to my work Outlook and to my Gmail account. Both Outlook and G

[PATCH] more lenient RFC2047 parsing (was Re: RFC2047 Subjects)

2010-09-02 Thread Michael Elkins
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:20:18PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote: Does mutt rely on the fact that encoded-text shouldn't have "?" or SPACE because it makes the implementation easier? Or is it just following the RFC strictly? Reading the RFC, it's not clear to me *why* encoded-text can't have "?" o