Backslashes in regexp (was: [0.95.7i bug] reply)

1999-08-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 16:13:54 -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > A warning here, since you are using "double quotes", that means that any > magic regexp characters that need quoting will require > double-backslashes, since Mutt is also parsing and removing them. For > instance, a "\." character wo

Re: [0.95.7i bug] reply

1999-08-20 Thread David DeSimone
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > set reply_regexp='^[Rr][Ee]:[ \t]+' > > changed to > > set reply_regexp="^[Rr][Ee]:[ \t]+" Yep, in the first case, the single-quotes prevent the "\t" from being translated to a "tab" character, so the regexp is evaluated as if it had a literal 't' ch

Re: [0.95.7i bug] reply

1999-08-20 Thread Fairlight
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:09:14PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > When I do a reply with Mutt 0.95.7i, if the subject starts with "Re: t", > the "t" is removed from the subject. Out of curiosity, have you tried a test condition to yourself that meets those criterion and checked the actual header

Re: [0.95.7i bug] reply

1999-08-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 17:09:14 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > When I do a reply with Mutt 0.95.7i, if the subject starts with "Re: t", > the "t" is removed from the subject. Finally no, this seems to be due to a change in Mutt's parser in recent versions (there was no problem in Mutt 0.93). I'

[0.95.7i bug] reply

1999-08-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
When I do a reply with Mutt 0.95.7i, if the subject starts with "Re: t", the "t" is removed from the subject. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - PhD student in Computer Science Web: or - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yello