Volker --
...and then Volker Moell said...
% David T-G wrote:
% >
% > I still don't see how you would use such data. What am I missing?
%
% Say replying to Foo Bar (with $attribution/$post_indent_string) I get
% this preformated mail:
%
%
% Hi, Foo Bar!
% >
%
David T-G wrote:
> % In replied messages it's the realname part in "From:", so now I want the
> % realname part in "To:" (prompted after typing "m"). Is this so
> % illogical?
>
> Nothing is ever illogical once the point of view is understood -- but I
> don't yet understand your point of view :-
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Dec 2001 Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> Thorsten Haude wrote:
>
> > I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you
> > want.
>
> Thanks, but I use emacs.
[-- snip --]
>
> And the reason my $EDITOR can't do it completely is to do "the
Volker --
...and then Volker Moell said...
% David T-G wrote:
% >
% > I don't get it, though. Those variables reference data from the replied
% > mail. What on earth do you expect to have in them when you're starting
% > a new mail?
%
% In replied messages it's the realname part in "From:", so
* Volker Moell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In replied messages it's the realname part in "From:", so now I want
> the realname part in "To:" (prompted after typing "m"). Is this so
> illogical?
It is when you allow editing of headers (doesn't everybody? :)
I'd recommend allowing editing of he
David T-G wrote:
>
> I don't get it, though. Those variables reference data from the replied
> mail. What on earth do you expect to have in them when you're starting
> a new mail?
In replied messages it's the realname part in "From:", so now I want the
realname part in "To:" (prompted after typ
Moin,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-05 15:57]:
>% > I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you
>% > want.
>% Thanks, but I use emacs.
>I think he was providing it as a starting base that you could adapt :-)
No; NEdit's macro language is mercifully unsimilar to
Volker --
...and then Volker Moell said...
% Thorsten Haude wrote:
%
% > I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you
% > want.
%
% Thanks, but I use emacs.
I think he was providing it as a starting base that you could adapt :-)
%
%
% > In any case, ask your edito
Thorsten Haude wrote:
> I could send you a NEdit solution that could be changed to do what you
> want.
Thanks, but I use emacs.
> In any case, ask your editor (and its command line), not Mutt.
I often read this answer (and I accept it). But I thought that if mutt
supports $attribution/$post_
* Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-12-2001 15:40]:
| * Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-05 14:44]:
| >But I'd like to have something similar when composing a new mail, but
| >unfortunately $attribution and $post_indent_string are only for
| >replying. Is there a equivalent way for n
Moin,
* Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-05 14:44]:
>But I'd like to have something similar when composing a new mail, but
>unfortunately $attribution and $post_indent_string are only for
>replying. Is there a equivalent way for new mails or is it possible to
>implement a workaround in an
Hi, mutt-users!
When replying a mail I use $attribution and $post_indent_string to spare
the time to write both of them. This works good.
But I'd like to have something similar when composing a new mail, but
unfortunately $attribution and $post_indent_string are only for
replying. Is there a eq
12 matches
Mail list logo
