On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:45:49PM -0700, FHDATA wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> my mutt is 1.5.20
>
>
> mutt -s hello u...@example.com < /tmp/jnk123
>
>
> what do I need to add to above and/or to .muttrc
> to prevent mutt from appending/saving outgoing email
> to the Sent folder?
You can read about
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:47:49PM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote:
> In this case it was "problematic" for me, because I didn't notice
> that you answered my mail as well, as mutt didn't show this
> message as reply to my mail.
This is another side effect... yes.
> I'd assume the first id in in-repl
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:42:47PM +0100, Thibaut Marty wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:28:46AM +0100, nfb wrote:
> > Cameron, you meant, hit 'g' always prepended by ';', didn't you? I
> > spent lots of time trying out, because i didn't know about t
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:57:03PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> nfb, your triple-reply carries this header:
>
> In-Reply-To: <20161107230059.ga19...@cskk.homeip.net>
> <20161108010855.dfy5bwr7jcn4c...@ruderich.org>
> <20161108011542.GA3594@ratatosk>
>
&g
Oh thank you all guys for your answers. Let me practice what i
learnt then... this kinda seems the appropriate use case too :)
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 10:00:59AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> It is pretty rare, but when I need to do it I tag all the source messages
> and hit 'g' (group-reply), a
Hi list,
here i want to submit to you some doubts I have when replying to some
mails. I may be a little OT, but i'd like to hear from you wether
answering to multiple emails at once, quoting text from them, is a
good practice, and how you accomplish that in mutt. Otherwise what is
the recommended w
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 05:47:01PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> I played around with your sequence and confirmed your observation.
> Changing the quotes from double to single quotes seems to get
> what you are looking for.
>
> Again that would go along with preserving backslashes during one
> round
> It looks to me as if a second round of evaluation is being done.
> During the first round the "\"s would be removed leaving "[[0-9]+]".
>
> The second round would pair the first "[" with the first "]", the
> one before the "+" and would make your character class be digits
> or opening square bra
Hi,
maybe this is a general and basic question about regex, but i also
tried on regex101.com and it really should work...
In my body i'd like to color URL indexes in the form [$ANYNUMBER], so
in my muttrc i set a line like this:
color body brightmagenta default "\[[0-9]+\]"
Now, strings like:
[1
Thanks Ian and Kevin, now i got it to work:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:41:56PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:09:10AM +0200, nfb wrote:
> > There are, however, some parts that preserve a solid black background,
> > like the "[-- Attachment ... -
Hi,
this is a question i have had aside for long time, so now that i
subscribed to the mailing listi, and after having searched enough
on the web, without apparent results, i will try to ask to you.
In mutt i have styled all the relevant parts to have a default
background, so that i see the native
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:42:38PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> TL;DR:
>
> $alias_file is expanded at muttrc parsing time, not when the folder-hook
> is run.
>
> One workaround is to defer evaluation of $alias_file by using
> \$alias_file (see https://dev.mutt.org/doc/manual.html#set-myvar).
12 matches
Mail list logo
