unsubscribe Mutt Users

2011-10-10 Thread XeCycle
unsubscribe -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795 E591

Re: NNTP reader?

2011-09-30 Thread XeCycle
I switched. As for an NNTP reader, try slrn. -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795 E591

Re: use a variable in .muttrc

2011-09-15 Thread XeCycle
ss --- probably the shell that you started it. But this way, the definition of $year and $an are in a shell forked by mutt, so the shell can't change the environment variables of their parent process. Hope it helps :) -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795 E591 pgpEXm3FDa2y2.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: verifying in-line signatures

2011-07-20 Thread XeCycle
Dan McDaniel writes: > On Thu 21.Jul.11 11:43, XeCycle wrote: >>Dan McDaniel writes: >> >>[...] >> >>After all it's deprecated. If mutt provides something like > > Interestingly, all the alerts I get from us-cert.gov are sent with > in-line signa

Re: verifying in-line signatures

2011-07-20 Thread XeCycle
r > detached signatures. After all it's deprecated. If mutt provides something like `message-hook', this could be done easily. -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795

Re: verifying in-line signatures

2011-07-20 Thread XeCycle
on it it verifies OK. Is there a way to make mutt > recognize these as having a signature? P check-traditional-pgp Do you mean this? -- Carl Lei (XeCycle) Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University OpenPGP public key: 7795E591 Fingerprint: 1FB6 7F1F D45D F681 C845 27F7 8D71 8EC4 7795 E

Re: Is mutt extensible with a programming language?

2011-06-26 Thread XeCycle
Jostein Berntsen writes: > On 24.06.11,23:52, XeCycle wrote: >> Hello, I've been using mutt for several months, and I like >> it. >> >> However I'm an Emacs fan, so I tried Gnus, but failed... it >> really is not a mail client. But Gnus can be eas

Re: Is mutt extensible with a programming language?

2011-06-24 Thread XeCycle
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 03:04:09AM +0200, lee wrote: > XeCycle writes: > >> Hello, I've been using mutt for several months, and I like >> it. >> >> However I'm an Emacs fan, so I tried Gnus, but failed... it >> really is not a mail client. But

Re: Is mutt extensible with a programming language?

2011-06-24 Thread XeCycle
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:05:17AM -0500, David Champion wrote: > * On 24 Jun 2011, XeCycle wrote: >> Hello, I've been using mutt for several months, and I like >> it. >> >> However I'm an Emacs fan, so I tried Gnus, but failed... it >> really i

Re: Is mutt extensible with a programming language?

2011-06-24 Thread XeCycle
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:20:01AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > XeCycle wrote: >> >> But Gnus can be easily extended >> with Emacs Lisp, which is a killer feature compared to mutt. > [...] >> Or --- Is there a fork of mutt that already support this? > > L

Re: Is mutt extensible with a programming language?

2011-06-24 Thread XeCycle
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:42:22AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:52:39PM +0800, XeCycle wrote: >> Hello, I've been using mutt for several months, and I like >> it. >> >> However I'm an Emacs fan, so I tried Gnus, but failed... it >

Is mutt extensible with a programming language?

2011-06-24 Thread XeCycle
Hello, I've been using mutt for several months, and I like it. However I'm an Emacs fan, so I tried Gnus, but failed... it really is not a mail client. But Gnus can be easily extended with Emacs Lisp, which is a killer feature compared to mutt. AFAIK I think mutt can only execute shell commands vi