Re: Mutt 1.0i

On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 10:39:59PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > Reed Lai [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > what the "i" means in Mutt 1.0i? > > "international" meaning it contains support for PGP and other encryption > stuff. This as opposed to the US-only version which lacks this support due > t

send-hook and alias questions.

Hi all, This is really three questions. (send-hook related) 1) Any suggestions on how to set up my send-hook's (or any hooks I suppose for that matter) so that I can make decisions based on whether I have an alias for the address I'm mailing. I want to have my default .signature, but f

Re: Forwarding attachments

> P.S. > Since I'm writing anyway, could someone repost the procmail rule to > turn non-MIME PGP signatures into MIME compliant attachments? ## PGP -- This converts from the old style PGP mail, to the MIME style ## that Mutt likes. This recipe is from doc/mutt/PGP-Notes.txt ## :0 * !

Re: Procmail and compressed folders

Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: fcc into somewhere other than '='

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 10:05:30PM -0500, James FitzGibbon wrote: > I use Maildir for all my mail, including lists and fcc folders. Under Pine, > I organized these folders like so: > > ~/mail/ > /inbox/ > /lists/ > /mutt-users/ > ... > /saved/ >

Re: input names problem still not resolved

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 03:43:04PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote: > > Now I've found a similar problem with adding attachments. If I hit [a] and > then input a valid file name like > /home/jrhett/docs/client stuff/myfile.txt > > I'll actually end up with > /home/jrhett/docs/ <- not a valid

Re: fcc-save-hook Question

Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=zhXaljGHf11kAtnf; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"