Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Scott V. McGuire
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:54:30PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > Scott V. McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems > > like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system > >

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Scott V. McGuire
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 02:29:21PM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote: > 2000-01-13-14:27:28 Scott V. McGuire: > > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It > > seems like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single > > user system when all I need is a

Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes -> bypassing MTA

2000-01-13 Thread Scott V. McGuire
> HTH, > Jeffrey > Any ideas on not using a full blown MTA for outgoing mail? It seems like overkill to run sendmail (or even qmail) on a single user system when all I need is a program to look like sendmail but immediately send mail to my isp's smtp server. -- Scott V.