On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:35:01PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * PeterKorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 16:30]:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> > > * Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 14:52]:
&
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:18:23PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Viktor Lakics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-05 12:21]:
> > Has anyone ever tried to work out how to autoview graphics inside mutt?
> >
> > To illustrate the point look at this screenshot:
> > http://lakics.homelinux.net/screenshot/sho
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:02:31PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16-10-2002 14:52]:
>
> [about PGP signatures]
>
> > Or to hide it unless specifically called?
>
> unset pgp_verify_sig
>
> --
> René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> T
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 04:28:01PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-05 14:06]:
> > Sven Guckes told:
> > > windows problems should be solved by
> > > people who get paid by M$, right?
> >
> > Yep, thats true. But why did you helped them with
> > a hund
It'z back.
My mutt viewer shows:
N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE
for the attached distribution. I think there was a
thread for a problem like this not so long ago.
The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer.
There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an ht
My mutt viewer shows:
N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE
for the attached distribution. I think there was a
thread for a problem like this not so long ago.
The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer.
There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an html
I'm wondering how the servers that manage the list
are set up. Is there 1 server that receives all
messages and many that send the messages to the
subscribers?
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children. +[]
[]
Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org
server?
Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space,
or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything?
Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since thats the only thing that works?
[JPK]
--
[]+ Wisdom is vindicated by
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:28:56AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Burton Samograd wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Hans Ginzel wrote:
> > >
> > > Something like:
> > > :function reread_cfg_files
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Burton Samograd wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:36:38PM +0200, Hans Ginzel wrote:
> >
> > Something like:
> > :function reread_cfg_files
> > : reset all options to compile time
> > : source startup files as by usual start
> >
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:40:27PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> > Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
> > mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:42:17AM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> > * PeterKorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17-09-2002 19:21]:
> >
> > > I think I can correctly interpret what you said in more t
I just did some trivial tests.
I'm working on something with 34924 files in a single directory
on linux ext3. I timed a simple file remove it took 0.044 seconds.
Most people I know dont call this a low end system. Based on this
data I think that this particular machine can tolerate any overhea
Lotus Notes does archives too. As long as you dont mind
spending 90 seconds to start your mail client
and having it occupy 96 megs of RAM. Itz a very heavy
client.
[JPK]
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:46:05PM -0400, Gil Hauer wrote:
> Outlook does indeed allow the user to archive old email based o
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> >
> > My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my "sent" folder.
> > Message 2 goes into my inbox.
> >
> > I could automatic
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:56PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> Peter,
>
> please send your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
>
Oops!
> * PeterKorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17-09-2002 18:21]:
>
> > Is there a way to thread full (non news group) conversations
> >
I'm set up with mutt to bcc all sent data to
a local address that qmail puts in the proper
Maildir subdirectory. Thatz fine for mailing list posts. But
If I want to thread normal conversations, I can't see the whole
converstion without bouncing between my sent directory and
my inbox.
I set this
18 matches
Mail list logo
