On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:25:11PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> Nicolas Williams [2010-12-08 13:25 -0600]:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> >>Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
> >>>On a related topic, is there any w
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Amit Ramon wrote:
> Chip Camden [2010-12-08 11:01 -0800]:
> >On a related topic, is there any way to get mutt to display RTL for
> >certain characters? The Hebrew characters in your signature, for
> >instance, are displayed LTR in my mutt, so they read ba
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:50:08PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:52:22PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
> > inside rxvt-unicode (urxvt) v9.07
> >
> > and I can't seem to get unicode characters to display properly. I have:
> >
> > set charset="utf-8"
>
> This comes up often
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:11:11AM +0100, Christian Ebert wrote:
> 5) ps has no --no-heading option here on Mac OS X (BSD-like).
Does it have a -o option where terminating the format list with an '='
causes no heading to be printed? It should, at least according to this:
http://developer.apple.c
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:07:28PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 10:00:27AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
> >It is, since Matthias must be using Solaris (given the reference to
> >truss(1)),
>
> #uname -s && which
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:52:22AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 6 at 04:31 PM, quoth Matthias Apitz:
> >It is converted *before* it is stored into the temp file for 'vim'; I've
> >checked this with truss(1) what mutt hands over to vim (see the
> >marked bytes):
>
> [...]
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:56:59PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Now here is the question: Would it be more likely that
> all zones share the same mutt configuration or would a
> typical administrator adjust each of them individually?
It has never occurred to me to edit Muttrc -- so much so t
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:38:30PM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
> On 2010-09-24, Nicolas Williams wrote
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:30:27AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:06:00AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > >#: commands.c:51
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:30:27AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:06:00AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >#: commands.c:513
> >#, fuzzy
> >msgid ""
> >"Sort (d)ate/(f)rm/(r)ecv/(s)ubj/t(o)/(t)hread/(u)nsort/si(z)e/s(c)ore/s(p)"
> >"am?: "
> >msgstr ""
> >"Órden
> >fech(a
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:52:37PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >Are you referring to pthreads or mail therading?
>
> Mail threading.
That's OK. I'd be happy to live with that, since eventually
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> The main issue is that some popular IMAP servers (gmail, exchange),
> do not support the SORT extensions, so you wouldn't be able to do
> the pageful-at-a-time and still have all of Mutt's current threading
> capabilities.
Interesti
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:32:54PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 September 2010 at 14:13, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote:
> > >On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > >>>4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Se
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:13:05PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> Yes, this is the problem. Mutt expects to see a FETCH response for
> each message the server says EXISTS. The IMAP standard requires
> that no "holes" exist in the message sequence numbers, and mutt is
> not prepared to handle them
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:38:16PM +0200, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> > On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
>
> > Do "H" and look at the headers and you'll see under References:
> > <20100919012315.gc36...@fbsd.t60.cpu> <20100919071840.ga26...@murdoc>
> >
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:49:57AM +0200, j...@telefonica.net wrote:
> Nico, I will search for your macro to see what can I do with regular
> expressions.
For your convenience:
macro index ,
!~D^J/path/to/some/maildir/^J^J
"Move all undeleted messages to maildir folders"
Then use ',' to move a
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:53:07AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:57:51PM +0200, j...@telefonica.net wrote:
> >I'm searching about a hook that will save to its mailbox all mails with
> >To: list_...@server.com after had read them, I think when changing
> >mailboxes.
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:37:48PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> You could probably get mutt to start with TERM=screen-bce is termcap has
> an appropriate entry for it. I found that even though mutt with slang
> uses terminfo, it queries termcap on startup.
screen(1) does set TERMCAP in the environ
BTW, I use screen in gnome-terminal.
I notice the following:
- TERM is screen-bce;
- VIM works fine, handles colors;
- Mutt built with S-Lang does not start unless I set TERM to xterm or
xterm-color; Mutt complains that "Key sequence is too long",
"SLcurses_initscr: init failed";
- I
May I suggest that trimming some of the quoted material in these
messages? It'd make it easier to read the thread, and maybe help out.
Nico
--
Personally I like having control over when expunges happen. Use '$' to
expunge (with default index key bindings).
Nico
--
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:45:12PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 03 Aug 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > Right. There
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-08-02, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
> > Right. There's no good convention for "end of list of arguments to an
> > option". There's only a good convention for "end of variable argum
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:36:05AM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> -- has special meaning in some unix command lines to provide an
> escape when names starting with a "-"-sign
> are concerned. (doesn't getopt use it as an escape anyway? not sure).
>
> mkdir -- -foo
> rmdir -- -foo
-- means "e
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:13:16PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 03:49:47PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 10:52:01PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > > Syntax has been changed: -a indicates a *list* of attachment files
> &g
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 10:52:01PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> Syntax has been changed: -a indicates a *list* of attachment files
> ending with "--". I don't recall which version was first to boast this
> new syntax, but it's the problem you're seeing right now even if it's
> not related to the
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:32:47AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> In this, iconv-hook is described as a method of handling a 'character
> set name' that is not known to Mutt. Is there a place where I can find
> a list of the character set names that are known to the copy of Mutt
> on my machine? Whe
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:41:37AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Thanks for tip about iconv. I do have both WINDOWS-1252 and CP1252 on my
> computer. So the second line should not be needed. While composing this
> email I suddenly realized that the charset names are probably case sensitive
> and my
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:42PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20100727_155630, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 27 at 12:35 PM, quoth Paul E Condon:
> > > 1) The short answer does not work. My copy of Mutt informs me that
> > > LC_TYPE is not a recognized variable name.
> >
>
> The
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:57:39PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > Instead of going through a for i in `cat users`do mutt ... $i done
> > loop I could make an alias of these users, but how do I tell to hide
> > the 100 users and only show up the one addressee plus a note that
> > the email went to
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:47:21AM +0200, ilf wrote:
> On 04-11 20:32, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:38:19AM +0200, ilf wrote:
> >> I would like a workaround to use Regex in 'lists' and 'subscribe', but
> >> that feels dirty. Why doesn't Mutt allow 'lists'/'subscribe' to list
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:24PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> - Image sample of failing e-mail (it will be auto-deleted in 7 days):
> http://picpaste.com/20100411_mutt_pager_wrapping.png
>
> - Raw code sample of failing e-mail (it will be auto-deleted in 1 day):
> http://pastebin.com/4t4kPSrh
(For
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:58:20PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> You might consider looking at tmux as a replacement for screen. I find
> it much more robust and the learning curve is not much. It makes some of
> screen's *features* more functional such as split screen w/o using one of
> the s
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:44:35AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Mar2010 17:51, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | > That's surprising; it suggests your $TERM isn't set up right outside
> | > mutt.
> |
> | It's a terminfo / libslang issue.
>
> Lucky t
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:44:09AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 30Mar2010 11:11, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> | > > If I complete
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:43:08AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > If I complete the reply immediately (as now), it's all seamless.
> >
> > But if I want to defer the reply for later, I simply
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:22PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 29Mar2010 17:19, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> | I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
> | this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
>
> Here's what I do:
>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:11:40PM -0700, George Davidovich wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but wouldn't temporarily resetting
> mutt's `sendmail' variable to a custom mailer (a variation on the OP's
> script, perhaps) take care of the replied flag issue?
No. The sendmail thing comes t
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:05:26PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> I think you can do all of your first idea with a macro. The basic
> idea is:
It won't do:
> [...]
> 5. Execute a script as you did before to start mutt on that
> postponed message.
First, this is a bad UI since I'll have to hi
I saw in the archives that this is a bit of an FAQ, and it seems that to
this day there's not much of an answer, sadly.
The best I could do was to create an index macro that pipes the current
message to a script that then: a) pipes stdin to formail, b) saves the
result in a tmp file, c) starts a n
39 matches
Mail list logo