On 2000-03-01 23:09:22 +1100, Chuck Dale wrote:
>
>
> The problem (as I see it) is that .muttrc goes against the principles
> which Mutt is following. Particularly in modularisation. The .muttrc
> contains absolutely everything configurable in the program - it defines
> the interface (keys, colu
On 2000-03-01 10:12:00 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The trick should be using a TERM setting which supports color. On
> my Debian system, I'm using TERM=xterm-xf86-v33, and it works nicely.
I think TERM=xterm-debian (the default in potato at least) gives colour
as well. I usually use the one
On 2000-02-16 16:22:11 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote:
> I still cannot figure out why this is happening. I tried setting
> pgp-micalg to all three of the possible algorithyms and I still get
> this wierd error:
>
> gpg: Can't check signature: unknown digest algorithm
Well your key isn't being ascii
On 2000-02-01 15:50:00 -0800, Corey wrote:
> Why do I see two instances of each folder, one with a '.' appended
> and one without?
It's because some IMAP servers, Cyrus is one of them, support having
folders inside folders, and a mailbox with the same namespace as a
folder.
So what you get
On 2000-01-13 11:23:37 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Matthew Hawkins [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Actually I think you can use folder-hook to implement a poor-man's
> > procmail. Personally, I use procmail :)
>
> This would work, but only to sort when you f
On 2000-01-13 12:54:07 -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-01-13-12:50:49 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS:
> > Nice, but some people want to leave mail on the server so that
> > they can access it from other places as well.
Not only that, take a corporate situation where the mail could be
sensitive - you don'
On 2000-01-12 16:08:06 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > I've read the online documentation at www.mutt.org and I cant find specific
> > information on how to get new mail put in folders based on patterns. can
>
> Mutt doesn't do this. Setup something like procmail.
Actually I think you can use
