Re: spam harvesting

2002-09-01 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > No, I will feel chained to my mail servers as people take that attitude, > > which has the nice effect of making it so they don't see the spam in their I didn't realize the guy was arguing from a mail admin

Re: spam harvesting

2002-09-01 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > (BTW, if anyone thinks calling them "the enemy", etc. is overly > melodramatic, remember that spam in recent years has moved more and > more from printer toner to all manner of pr0n, beastiality, etc. > spams, and many of us are stuck trying to keep our

Re: Outlook and "inline attachments"

2002-08-30 Thread Eugen Leitl
begin Fri, 30 Aug 2002 Sven Guckes quotation: > two blanks? really? Of course. In fact I later noticed you used the same example in one of your signatures. > > But what's the point? Bosses define what constitutes brokenness. > > If he can't read your email, it's your fault, not his client's

Re: Emulating (gaaack) Outlook attribution

2002-08-30 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > set attibution="begin 666 quoted text of %boss" begin followed by two blanks anywhere in the mail body would do, until termininated by an end But what's the point? Bosses define what constitutes brokenness. If he can't read your email, it's your f