sort by three keys?

I sort my mailboxes with "sort=threads", "sort_aux=last-date-received". I would like to apply scores to messages and sort threads first by maximum message score, second by last-date-received. Is something like that possible? David -- David Young dyo...@pobox.comUrbana, IL(217) 721-9981

Re: Bottom posting v top posting

g/summary/link-sets.discussion-summary Dave -- David Young dyo...@pobox.comUrbana, IL(217) 721-9981

html signature?

witch to GMail.) Dave -- David Young dyo...@pobox.comUrbana, IL(217) 721-9981

Re: email has changed, you won't change everyone, and you don't have to

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:27:19PM +0100, Holger Weiß wrote: > * David Young [2012-11-20 11:59]: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:42:13PM +, John Long wrote: > > > Take some responsibility for yourself and your content. Post like a man > > > not > > > a webb

email has changed, you won't change everyone, and you don't have to

taste, priorities, available time, attention, perceptual strengths and weaknesses, and spit out something that's not only more palatable but more useful, but software doesn't do that. One reason email software is not more useful is that because too many smart people wage a losing war on the

Re: abrt mail send if failed attach

ments. Somebody(TM) could add to Mutt a command for initiating an email beginning with the attachments. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 344-0444 x24

Re: advanced search

> > first reply > > > > original message Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933

Re: Unix Philosophy (was List management headers)

me ancillary software to produce a useful email application. There is probably a Linux distribution that does that for you. I install Mutt from pkgsrc.org, myself; it seems to come reasonably complete that way, but my application may be different from yours. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933

Re: Unix Philosophy (was List management headers)

atter how many pieces form it. The advantage that assembling an application in the "UNIX-y" way has over a monolithic application is that the parts can usually be disassembled and reassembled for the purposes of testing, automation, creating new and improving old applications. Dave -- D

Re: saving from IMAP folder F to F deletes

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:19:06PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Wednesday, 17 December 2008 at 15:15, David Young wrote: > > Today I have found that if I save a message M in IMAP folder F to > > the same folder F, and then I sync folder F by tapping '$', then > >

Re: saving from IMAP folder F to F deletes

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 04:19:56PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday, December 17 at 04:14 PM, quoth David Young: > >> The way to test this is to see what happens when you use mutt's > >> function

Re: saving from IMAP folder F to F deletes

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:35:29PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday, December 17 at 03:15 PM, quoth David Young: > > Today I have found that if I save a message M in IMAP folder F to > > the same folder F, and

saving from IMAP folder F to F deletes

is behavior fixed in mutt version 1.4.2.3 or later? (I run Mutt 1.4.2.1i.) 2 If the behavior is not fixed, where can I file a PR? Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyo...@ojctech.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933