On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:28:55PM -0500, Sven Semmler wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > I've since written a filter to preprocess the HTML and remove the
> > extra formatting before passing it to w3m. The traditional PGP coming
&
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:32:05PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My company uses PGP/GPG when sending sensitive material through email.
> > Unfortunately (for them and me), most people use
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:31:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:15:26PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > Thanks for the tip. Mutt still doesn't recognize the PGP block,
> > however. :( That's not surprising. It probably doesn't check th
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Jens John wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly
> > handle encypted emails.
>
> Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native suppo
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 09:13:59AM +0100, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> On 2020-04-26 08:04,
> Dave Woodfall put forth the proposition:
> > On 2020-04-25 21:46,
> > David Engel put forth the proposition:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> >
> > Elinks[1] has an op
output
through gpg -d doesn't work. gpg errors out when there isn't any
encrypted part to decrypt and also doesn't preserve the surrounding
text. Even if I can get this postprocessing to work, Mutt won't know
that the original email was encrypted and automatically encrypt any
replies I send.
David
--
David Engel
da...@istwok.net
