Reply-to-all function?

2000-05-30 Thread Chris Woodfield
It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as well? -Chris -- --- Christopher A. Woodfield[EMAIL PROTECTED] Finger for public PGP key 0xB887618B - email fo

Re: Controlling default in save command?

2000-05-16 Thread Chris Woodfield
ot; +target > or > save-hook "~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +target > or > save-hook "~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +target > > Take a look at http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.14 > > HTH, > Steffan > > On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:51:

Controlling default in save command?

2000-05-15 Thread Chris Woodfield
How does one control the default string that's populated when you save a message? Or in my case, not have one? At the moment (usint the default .muttrc), the default is "=". My ideal would be the default to be the argument given with the last save command (like pine)... -Chris -

Re: mutt-1.2: imap/ssl certificates

2000-05-14 Thread Chris Woodfield
Me three. I'm running the latest version of OpenSSH for Linux, on a libc5 machine. I wonder if libc5 could be the issue...however, I don't have access to a glibc2 machine that has access to a IMAP/SSL server to test. -C On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 06:23:47PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > On Wed,

pkspxycwrap?

2000-05-14 Thread Chris Woodfield
What is this and where does one find it? It's in the pgp6.rc file: # fetch keys set pgp_getkeys_command="pkspxycwrap %r" ... but it sure as tootin' ain't in MY distribution of pgp v6...and I get a "command not found" error every time I try to decrypt or verify a signature. BTW, my copy of PGP i

Re: PGP error messages

2000-02-09 Thread Chris Woodfield
in the doc/manual.txt file, except for the pgp_v2* variables. I can't even put the pgp_default_version variable in my .muttrc without getting the unkown variable editor. THe other thing is that according to said doc/manual.txt, the only options for pgp_default_version are pgp2, pgp5, and gpg. I just installed 6.5.2...am I going to be able to use that, or do I have to roll back to 5.x? -Chris Woodfield