Re: why does mutt open PDF with okular over mupdf?

2015-06-06 Thread Xu Wang
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2015-06-06 11:17 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > > Xu> I do not want to change it. I just want to understand. mupdf is my > Xu> default PDF reader. Also, xdg-open uses mupdf. mimeopen uses > Xu> mupdf. I have nothing in .mailcap about PDFs. > > Xu

MailToMutt for OS X

2015-06-06 Thread Ian Lintault
For those of you on OS X, MailToMutt has been updated and modernized: * Handles system wide mailto: * Send mail using AppleScript with a single command 'mailto' * Handles to,cc,bcc,subject, body and an attachment url * Uses iTerm2 to display Mutt interactively * Option for immediate sending witho

Re: why does mutt open PDF with okular over mupdf?

2015-06-06 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-06-06 11:17 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: Xu> I do not want to change it. I just want to understand. mupdf is my Xu> default PDF reader. Also, xdg-open uses mupdf. mimeopen uses Xu> mupdf. I have nothing in .mailcap about PDFs. Xu> I have read the manual but it mostly talks about .mailcap entries

Re: why does mutt open PDF with okular over mupdf?

2015-06-06 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 11:17:26AM -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > I do not want to change it. I just want to understand. mupdf is my > default PDF reader. Also, xdg-open uses mupdf. mimeopen uses mupdf. I > have nothing in .mailcap about PDFs. > > I have read the manual but it mostly talks about .mailcap

why does mutt open PDF with okular over mupdf?

2015-06-06 Thread Xu Wang
I do not want to change it. I just want to understand. mupdf is my default PDF reader. Also, xdg-open uses mupdf. mimeopen uses mupdf. I have nothing in .mailcap about PDFs. I have read the manual but it mostly talks about .mailcap entries. So how does mutt choose an application to open files if

Re: Using send-hook to unset sig for some recipients

2015-06-06 Thread Larry Hynes
On 2015-06-06, Larry Hynes wrote: > Hello list > > In order not to bother my family with repeated exposure to my > signature, I use the following send-hook setup: > > send-hook . set signature > send-hook '~t ^foo@bar\.com$' unset signature > > This works, but only up to a point; the signa

Re: Using send-hook to unset sig for some recipients

2015-06-06 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 06.06.15 12:08, Larry Hynes wrote: > In order not to bother my family with repeated exposure to my > signature, I use the following send-hook setup: > > send-hook . set signature > send-hook '~t ^foo@bar\.com$' unset signature > > This works, but only up to a point; the signature is un

Re: Using send-hook to unset sig for some recipients

2015-06-06 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Larry Hynes [06-06-15 07:15]: > Hello list > > In order not to bother my family with repeated exposure to my > signature, I use the following send-hook setup: > > send-hook . set signature > send-hook '~t ^foo@bar\.com$' unset signature > > This works, but only up to a point; the sign

Using send-hook to unset sig for some recipients

2015-06-06 Thread Larry Hynes
Hello list In order not to bother my family with repeated exposure to my signature, I use the following send-hook setup: send-hook . set signature send-hook '~t ^foo@bar\.com$' unset signature This works, but only up to a point; the signature is unset for the intended recipient but is no