Re: Two private SMIME certificates conundrum

2015-04-04 Thread Dave Dodge
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 07:15:54PM +0200, Bernard Massot wrote: > David J. Weller-Fahy wrote : > > After much frustration I discovered why mutt wouldn't work with the > > SMIME keys issued at work: there are two of the private keys (one for > > signature, one for encryption), and a single public ke

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

2015-04-04 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 04/04/15 11:54 -0700 - Kevin J. McCarthy: So, actually, the current situation where mutt asks whether it should use the key specified with the crypt-hook is superflucious in my setup. If I have designated a specific key for a specific user using the hook, there is no need to ask me for a verif

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

2015-04-04 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Rejo Zenger wrote: > ++ 04/04/15 16:33 +0200 - Rejo Zenger: > >I have specificaly selected and configured a number of key ID's for a > >mailinglist. This is a deliberate action, and if a key is not available > >there is no need to select an alternative. Keys are always > > So, actually, the curren

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

2015-04-04 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 04/04/15 16:33 +0200 - Rejo Zenger: I have specificaly selected and configured a number of key ID's for a mailinglist. This is a deliberate action, and if a key is not available there is no need to select an alternative. Keys are always So, actually, the current situation where mutt asks w

Re: Two private SMIME certificates conundrum

2015-04-04 Thread Bernard Massot
David J. Weller-Fahy wrote : > After much frustration I discovered why mutt wouldn't work with the > SMIME keys issued at work: there are two of the private keys (one for > signature, one for encryption), and a single public key. What's that protocol? Until known I've only heard of sender's private

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

2015-04-04 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 03/04/15 18:44 -0700 - Kevin J. McCarthy: I'm cleaning up and looking into committing the multiple crypt hook patch, but need some feedback from people who use it. The current behavior (without that patch) is to prompt whether to use the crypt-hook value if one is found. If the user answers

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

2015-04-04 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 04/04/15 09:28 +0200 - Heinz Diehl: On 04.04.2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: I'm cleaning up and looking into committing the multiple crypt hook patch, but need some feedback from people who use it. Where can I find the patch? See: - http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3727 - https://githu

Re: Multiple crypt-hook behavior

2015-04-04 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 04.04.2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > I'm cleaning up and looking into committing the multiple crypt hook > patch, but need some feedback from people who use it. Where can I find the patch?