> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
>> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having
>> tens of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
-snip off responses-
Thank you for your informative responses.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:52:25PM +0200, Nathan Schwarz wrote:
But alternative_order works fine, no more html-mail or lynx-dumps :)
However, note that at least some multipart/alternative emails come with
an empty or trivial text/plain part. I don't know why someone would go
to the trouble o
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having
> tens of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
Depending on how large the mailbox is, you may see timeouts under
certain conditions if something (e.g.
Nope, just tried it. It didn't work!
Thanks,
Russ
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:15:22PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you set correct password for the 2nd auth
> method (CRAM-MD5), it works OK?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
> of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
>
> Thank You.
I've had up to 40k messages in a mbox file, collecting debian-devel. The only
effect I n
* On 18 Sep 2014, Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 2014/9/18 4:27 PM, David Champion wrote:
> > * On 18 Sep 2014, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
> >> of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
> >>
> >> Thank You.
> >
> > [47
On 2014/9/18 4:27 PM, David Champion wrote:
> * On 18 Sep 2014, Mark Filipak wrote:
>> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
>> of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
>>
>> Thank You.
>
> [473/130]$ du -sh /var/mail/dgc
> 466M/var/mail/dgc
>
* On 18 Sep 2014, Mark Filipak wrote:
> How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
> of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
>
> Thank You.
[473/130]$ du -sh /var/mail/dgc
466M/var/mail/dgc
I only have ~25k messages in my inbox right now. I used
How is mutt with multi-mega-byte mboxes? Have you found that having tens
of thousands of messages in a single box is dangerous?
Thank You.
Hello,
unfortunately, it looks like there's no way to
distinguish between the unsupported DIGEST-MD5 and
wrond password for CRAM-MD5 -- the server's reply
is the same:
> 5< 500 5.7.0 Unknown AUTH error -1 (Internal authentication error).
1. (digest)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 06:46:48AM -0500, Russ
Ah sorry - it's not mutt, as stated in RFC1521 the first possible
attachment should be opened and the order of attachments is set by the
sender, whereas the definition is, that the least favorable message-type
should be the last one in order.
Thus, mutt works compliant to the RFCs and the problem
Mutt gives text/html seniority over text/plain.
To change this put this in your muttrc:
'alternative_order text/plain text/html'
- Nathan
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ / - against HTML emails
X - against proprietory attachments
/ \ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign
On 09
Hi,
>From time to time I'm getting mails having the message as text and HTML
at the same time in the body; ofc this is bad posting style of the sender and
maybe one should not care about and just delete such mails;
to display HTML attachments I have in my .mailcap:
$ fgrep lynx .mailcap
text/h
13 matches
Mail list logo
