Hi Willy,
I got the +DEBUG when i ran that command.
When i went to my ~ directory, and did the touch command, nothing happened.
I too thought i might not have permission, but i have written things to this
directory.
Does mutt have to be chmod ed to do this? I execute the program, but have neve
> The message is that not everyone has time to become an expert in how
> e-mail works fundamentally, and not everyone should. In fact, just
> about no one should. This is what specialization is all about, and
> like it or not our society has become extremely specialized.
No, I'm sorry, the spec
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:11:57PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.09.14 14:48, Derek Martin wrote:
> > You had to understand how it works, and configure your editor to do it
> > right. Most users do not want to do that, and they should not have to.
>
> IIUC, the message is that those user
=== Lurk-Mode OFF ===
Duck and cover!
=== Lurk-Mode ON ===
On 2014/9/15 10:09 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 14.09.14 16:29, Will Yardley wrote:
>> The problem, though, is that doing so in a tool like mutt where the
>> editor is (by design) completely divorced from the MUA does make it a
>> l
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 08:11:57PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.09.14 09:29, Will Yardley wrote:
> > Yes, but if you forget to do this, or manually mangle a line, you could
> > end up generating non-compliant text.
> >
> > My point isn't that there aren't editors that are capable of gen
Hello Russ,
Just to be clear, the following.
What does ``mutt -v | grep DEBUG'' give?
If the answer is +DEBUG, then ...
>From man mutt:
``If mutt was complied with +DEBUG log debugging output to ~/.muttdebug0. Level
can range from 1-5 and effects verbosity. A value of 2 is recommended.''
Di
Hi again,
I got the lock off my mail, so i am back up and running.
I still cannot generate a muttdebug file. I have checked and recompiled my
versions of mutt. I have started mutt with the -d4 parameter, but still nothing.
Thanks again to everyone!
Russ
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:08:43PM
On 15.09.14 09:29, Will Yardley wrote:
> Yes, but if you forget to do this, or manually mangle a line, you could
> end up generating non-compliant text.
>
> My point isn't that there aren't editors that are capable of generating
> the text correctly, but that it's difficult to mutt to know for sur
