On 2014-01-04 20:01:56 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm using mutt (right now by typing) on my FreeBSD netbook, connected
> via UMTS WAN to my ISP. My mutt drops the mail (this mail) to the local
> MTA (sendmail) and this takes care for the transport to the next MX hop,
> even if the WAN link is
On 04Jan2014 20:01, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Sunday, January 05, 2014 a las 02:50:12AM +0800, Chris Down escribió:
> > On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT.
> > > So far I have been using postfix for mail tr
On 04Jan2014 20:30, Tom Furie wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote:
>
> > However, mutt still doesn't recognize header_cache or
> > certificatg_file (again, undefined variables), and it still won't
> > send mail.
>
> I'm not very familiar with this side of
Hi,
I sync my settings between different machines via Dropbox. I have
settings for several accounts and each in its own file. When I open a
specific inbox via a macro like
macro index
'imaps://acco...@mailserver.com/INBOX'
I use a folder-hook to source a specific account file
folder-hook 'mail
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote:
> However, mutt still doesn't recognize header_cache or
> certificatg_file (again, undefined variables), and it still won't
> send mail.
I'm not very familiar with this side of mutt, but are you sure that
certificatg_file isn't a
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote:
Hello!
I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with:
--enable-smtp
so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined
variables (Thanks!).
However, mutt still doesn't re
Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote:
Hello!
I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with:
--enable-smtp
so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined
variables (Thanks!).
However, mutt still doesn't re
El día Sunday, January 05, 2014 a las 02:50:12AM +0800, Chris Down escribió:
> On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> > Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT.
> > So far I have been using postfix for mail transport.
> > Which way is better, and why?
>
> "B
On 2014-01-04 19:35:19 +0100, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT.
> So far I have been using postfix for mail transport.
> Which way is better, and why?
"Better" is subjective. Using Postfix for this is pretty heavy duty over
using a purpose-bui
Recent posts made me aware of the fact, that mutt supports SMPT.
So far I have been using postfix for mail transport.
Which way is better, and why?
Thanks for advice,
ulrich
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:28:46PM -0500, Charles E Campbell wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with:
>
> --enable-smtp
>
> so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being undefined
> variables (Thanks!).
>
> However, mutt still doesn't rec
Hello!
I used David Champion's suggestion to compile mutt with:
--enable-smtp
so at least its not complaining about smtp_pass and smtp_url being
undefined variables (Thanks!).
However, mutt still doesn't recognize header_cache or certificatg_file
(again, undefined variables), and it still w
12 matches
Mail list logo