On 2013-12-16 12:39:47 +1100, m...@raf.org wrote:
> that's what the content-disposition is supposed to mean but
> outlook must have its own ideas about such things. it works
> in thunderbird.
Outlook (as with most Microsoft software) is not standards compliant,
you should expect it to do strange t
Jeffery Small wrote:
> m...@raf.org writes:
>
> >Jeffery Small wrote:
>
> >> Is there any convenient way to craft an email message using mutt that
> >> embeds a jpeg image within the body of the message for those reading
> >> with an HTML mail program, while still attaching it for others who use
On 2013-12-15 12:32:40 +, Christian Ebert wrote:
> You can just use it without the --safe option?
Right -- my point was about doing it without an external script. For now
catting it to a file and opening it in chromium is sufficient, but it
has some annoying caveats (charset, unsafe stuff)...
* Chris Down on Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 12:00:45 +0800
> On 2013-12-14 14:08:35 +, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> Shameless plug: https://bitbucket.org/blacktrash/muttils has a
>> viewhtmlmsg script which can be bound to a key.
>
> This looks pretty nice, thanks. Some of the checks it does see
