On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:40:15PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:08:05PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:47:41PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> > > Am I missing something? Is it more useful for non-IMAP use?
> >
> > I use it as a visual clue to which f
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:08:05PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:47:41PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> > Am I missing something? Is it more useful for non-IMAP use?
>
> I use it as a visual clue to which folders have new mail. I find it
> more useful when I use it with mutt-
++ 08/12/13 10:21 -0700 - Chris Down:
>not a mailing list thread where none of us are lawyers. Either way, I
[...]
No. We are not lawyers. So, I contacted a well-known Dutch lawyer.
His response was practically the same as Remco Rijnders': given the
circumstances it's safe to assume GPLv2 applie
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:47:41PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote:
> Well, now that I've gotten the sidebar patch working, I'm sorry to say
> I don't see much point to it. It does allow me to get to other
> mailboxes quickly, but so does 'c TAB' and then j and k to move around
> the list. In general, the
Well, now that I've gotten the sidebar patch working, I'm sorry to say
I don't see much point to it. It does allow me to get to other
mailboxes quickly, but so does 'c TAB' and then j and k to move around
the list. In general, the sidebar just seems to take up some screen
space and add visual clutt
