> Whatever you choose to do, once you get used to it, it's the best email
> client out there ...
Of the various mail user agents I have investigated, only mutt
and gnus offer good efficiency in the handling of a large volume of
messages. Not coincidentally, neither mutt nor gnus makes use
of the
* On 26 Nov 2013, Charles E Campbell wrote:
>
> The core dumps don't do me much good; the mutt I'm using came via a yum
> install, so it uses hex addressing. ~/.mutt/cache exists, but no headers,
Which yum repo is it from?
> I tried building mutt myself (mutt 1.5.21); it builds, but "blesses"
Hello!
I've been trying to use mutt from my home computer (it works ok from my
work computer). Both use Scientific Linux 6.3. All I get on my home
computer is core dumps.
Here's my test: echo "TESTING" | mutt -s '[testing] 1-2-3'
drchip-@-campbell-family-biz (in the email: remove first
I understand your concerns about this but I don't think you'll find it a
problem in the long run. I occasionally hit the wrong key and there is always
a way of undoing what I've done (aside from saying 'no' when Mutt actually asks
me if I really want to do something, which personally I like).
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Martin Vegter wrote:
>
> I have found the following in the manual:
>
> bindindex j noop
> bindindex k noop
>
> the problem with this approach is, that I have to unbind every
> single key-binding explicitly.
It mak
On 2013-11-26 00:05, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Martin Vegter [11-25-13 17:33]:
as a new user, I feel intimidated by the many key bindings in Mutt. Not
only do I see no chance of ever needing more than 5% of them, but I am
afraid that by accidentally pressing some key, I will perform some
"acti
