On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:35:07PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
> >
> > Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are "why would I
> > want to?"
>
> That's when you get a chance to explain it. "Wouldn't it be neat if
> you could order weed from your dealer
Incoming from Will Fiveash:
>
> As a side note, I wonder if a pgp/gpg signature as proof of authorship
> has ever been tested in court? My guess is no.
The legal community considers fax to be cutting edge reliable tech.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
Incoming from Robert Holtzman:
>
> Your dreaming. In my experience 99.9% of the replies are "why would I
> want to?"
That's when you get a chance to explain it. "Wouldn't it be neat if
you could order weed from your dealer via email?" :-O As opposed to
over the phone with AT&T forwarding all y
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:22:47PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
> > I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
> > actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
> > encryption. I.e.: "What
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:37:46AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
> I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
> actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
> encryption. I.e.: "What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
> of your emails?" "That,
Dear Mutt users,
I don't know if this is specific to mutt (in fact I don't think so), but maybe
someone here can help me. How can I reply to a lotus notes invitation within
mutt? I see that the said invitation is a ics file and perhaps just changing
one of the field can do it, but I don't know whi
Incoming from Dale Raby:
> encryption. I.e.: "What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
> of your emails?" "That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
> right software you can verify that I sent you that message, and we can
> even send encrypted emails that nobody else can read
* Dale Raby [03-06-13 10:39]:
[...]
> I see no problem in signing list posts. For those who want to verify
> them, its easy to set up, those who don't can ignore them just as
> easily. Its not like you are printing them out and reading them from
> paper, after all.
Which is the same argument h
I sign most of my messages, even though I only know a few people who
actively use GnuPG/PGP. As I see it, this is one way of promoting
encryption. I.e.: "What is that block of gibberish you have at the end
of your emails?" "That, my friend is my public key. If you have the
right software you ca
2013/3/6 Andre Klärner :
> Hi Kunszt,
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:05:06AM +0100, Kunszt Árpád wrote:
>> When I'm using the interactive user-interface everything works fine,
>> but from the command line it doesn't work. I tried a lot of things,
>> googled half of the day, but I didn't found any w
Incoming from Florian Lohoff:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
> > I have a couple of comments about this:
> >
> > - Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
> > others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
> > blo
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:24:44PM -0600, Will Fiveash wrote:
> I have a couple of comments about this:
>
> - Why sign most messages? Unless the information is important for
> others to verify that it came from a particular person why add the
> bloat of a signature. Beyond this I find
12 matches
Mail list logo
