On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:15:49PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:44:17PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:43:12PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > Same arguemnt as above. Also this is mostly not interesting
> > > anymore. When you compare this
On 16.12.12 12:20, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:00:25PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> > On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > That has the advantage that the [list-gumpf] is gone not only from the
> > index, but also from the edit-headers in vim, when replying.
>
Dale wrote:
> http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html
>
> Item 4.10
>
> I think the item you want is the pop_checkinterval variable
>
> The default is 60 seconds
Thanks I just tried that after I posted my previous response. It doesn't
work either (but it sure looked like it should!)
* Dale Raby [12-16-12 12:40]:
[...]
> You might wish to consider using IMAP instead. This protocol keeps the
> message on the server where you can access it again from, say, the
> computer at the public library. POP3 will also allow this, but it is
> not the default behavior in most cases.
Or
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:44:17PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:43:12PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > Same arguemnt as above. Also this is mostly not interesting
> > anymore. When you compare this to the amount of bandwidth consumed
> > by things like streaming vide
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:00:25PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> That has the advantage that the [list-gumpf] is gone not only from the
> index, but also from the edit-headers in vim, when replying.
It also has the disadvantage that the [list-gump
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:30:56AM -0600, David Champion wrote:
>
> In the end, the tags are just put back by the MLM anyway, so the only
> thing this did for me (vs an MUA-only solution) was to save me from
> looking at the tags in my editor. Now I just hide the tag in my index
> view. Much che
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:37:29AM -0600, Dale Raby wrote:
> On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote:
> > Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
> > than using fetchmail etc.?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > /jl
> >
> The short answer is "yes". The long answer is, maybe
On 12/16/2012 10:37 AM, John Long wrote:
> Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
> than using fetchmail etc.?
>
> Thanks.
>
> /jl
>
The short answer is "yes". The long answer is, maybe, if your
particular Mutt is compiled with the POP support option.
You will
Is there any way to retrieve pop mail automatically in mutt itself rather
than using fetchmail etc.?
Thanks.
/jl
--
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong
against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD
and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org
attachments /
* On 15 Dec 2012, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Probably it is not yet in mutt, but might be included later. Many
> > features from mutt started as separate patches (or are still flying
> > around as patches) until they have been included into main m
11 matches
Mail list logo
