Re: mutt and not really read only mailboxes

2012-08-23 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:49:07PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > Not really. You can't really fix this. If mutt can't lock the folder > then other processes (e.g. the MDA) can change the contents out from > under Mutt while it's reading the file, potentially resulting in an > inconsistent state

Colour issues in mutt under S-Lang

2012-08-23 Thread Daniel P. Wright
Hello, I've been trying to tweak my colour scheme recently, and found some strange functionality which I don't understand. I'm not sure if it's a bug or an error in my configuration -- and if it is a bug I don't know whether it lies in mutt, or s-lang, or my terminal. The problem is as follows:

Re: Search for threads with flagged mail

2012-08-23 Thread David Champion
* On 23 Aug 2012, Alexis Letessier wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a filter to select threads containing flagged mail? ~(~F) > BTW, i've asked a similar question about finding mails with > text/calendar attachments but the ~b filter is way too slow to be > usable. I only need to change the color o

Search for threads with flagged mail

2012-08-23 Thread Alexis Letessier
Hello, Is there a filter to select threads containing flagged mail? BTW, i've asked a similar question about finding mails with text/calendar attachments but the ~b filter is way too slow to be usable. I only need to change the color of these mails in the index. I saw the RFC on mutt-dev about se

Re: mutt and not really read only mailboxes

2012-08-23 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:24:40PM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote: > However, it then forks the mutt_dotlock process, which fails > because it the filesystem with the mbox is readonly. > > The source from mbox.c reads > if (mbox_lock_mailbox (ctx, 0, 0) == -1) > { > mutt_unblock_si

Re: mutt and not really read only mailboxes

2012-08-23 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:39:25AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote: > > If just seems that mutt does not check for new mails at all when > it considers a mailbox read only. I need to correct myself: With an strace, I see that mutt does a stat() on the mbox file with every keypress while in the index

Re: mutt and not really read only mailboxes

2012-08-23 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:28:35AM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Thu, August 23, 2012 08:53, Joerg Dorchain wrote: > > I have a setup where my MTA delivers mail to an mbox file, which > > then is in turn exported via nfs read only to the client where > > mutt is running. Main purpose of thi

Re: mutt and not really read only mailboxes

2012-08-23 Thread Christian Brabandt
On Thu, August 23, 2012 08:53, Joerg Dorchain wrote: > I have a setup where my MTA delivers mail to an mbox file, which > then is in turn exported via nfs read only to the client where > mutt is running. Main purpose of this construction is viewing > certain attachments. > > While all this works fi