Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 09 December 2011 at 13:11, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Brendan Cully wrote: > > > > > > > > After upgrading to mutt-devel-1.5.21_3 from ports (FreebSD 7.4-STABLE) > > > > the mark_old=yes option ceased working in IMAP folders (it still works > > > > in local mboxes). > > > > > > > > Now,

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Brendan Cully wrote: > > > > > > After upgrading to mutt-devel-1.5.21_3 from ports (FreebSD 7.4-STABLE) > > > the mark_old=yes option ceased working in IMAP folders (it still works > > > in local mboxes). > > > > > > Now, when I exit an IMAP mailbox without reading some new messages, > > > and t

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 09, 2011 at 12:45 PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: I have been quite happy with mutt alone as an IMAP client. I would be happy with the IMAP support, but I find offlineimap is more graceful in handling me putting my laptop to sleep throughout the day as I move about. Absolutely not.

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Tim Gray wrote: > >Have I asked something weird or does nobody use IMAP? > > I think a lot of us use offlineimap. At least I do. I have been quite happy with mutt alone as an IMAP client. > > >I clearly remember IMAP messages becoming "O" in mutt-1.4.2.3_4, and I > >miss the feature very much.

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 09 December 2011 at 08:59, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > > After upgrading to mutt-devel-1.5.21_3 from ports (FreebSD 7.4-STABLE) > > the mark_old=yes option ceased working in IMAP folders (it still works > > in local mboxes). > > > > Now, when I exit an IMAP mai

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 09, 2011 at 08:59 AM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: Have I asked something weird or does nobody use IMAP? I think a lot of us use offlineimap. At least I do. I clearly remember IMAP messages becoming "O" in mutt-1.4.2.3_4, and I miss the feature very much. I wonder, where mutt could hav

Re: mark_old=yes does not work for IMAP folders

2011-12-08 Thread Victor Sudakov
Victor Sudakov wrote: > > After upgrading to mutt-devel-1.5.21_3 from ports (FreebSD 7.4-STABLE) > the mark_old=yes option ceased working in IMAP folders (it still works > in local mboxes). > > Now, when I exit an IMAP mailbox without reading some new messages, > and then open it again, those me

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 09, 2011 at 12:05 AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: But this will not match if the mail is From: foo and To: bar, baz You'll just need to add a couple more hooks to catch all the cases. It's really all explained in the manual. fcc-save-hook '~f foo ~C bar ~C baz' project_folder fcc

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Eric Smith
Yes Tim But this will not match if the mail is From: foo and To: bar, baz -- - Eric Smith Tim Gray said: > On Dec 08, 2011 at 10:39 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: > >So if it is a mail from one of three names and the other two names are > >in ~C (To: or Cc:), then it is a match. > >What is the smar

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 08, 2011 at 08:15 AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote: On Dec 08, 2011 at 12:08 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR. All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or Oops. Just take that the |'s then. If you just place several search modifi

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 08, 2011 at 10:39 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: So if it is a mail from one of three names and the other two names are in ~C (To: or Cc:), then it is a match. What is the smartest way to specify this logic with an fcc-save-hook? If I understand correctly, the following should do it. It's

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Eric Smith
Tim Gray said: > On Dec 08, 2011 at 12:08 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: > >Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR. > >All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or > > Oops. Just take that the |'s then. If you just place several > search modifiers together, a logical AN

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Tim Gray
On Dec 08, 2011 at 12:08 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR. All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or Oops. Just take that the |'s then. If you just place several search modifiers together, a logical AND is assumed.

Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients

2011-12-08 Thread Eric Smith
Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR. All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or Cc: fo the rule to apply. -- - Eric Smith Tim Gray said: > On Dec 05, 2011 at 10:23 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: > >If a sent or received mail has a certain list of email addresses in

Re: How to create a label for mutt-users based on Sender [solved, hopefully]

2011-12-08 Thread Tibor Attila Anca
Hi, 2011/12/7 Brandon McCaig : > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:30:35AM +0100, Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > can use "Has the words: list:()" to filter > on (the label is part of G-mail's interface, not part of your > query). You can test the query to make sure it matches all > appropriate messages. I d