message-hook for set index_format

2011-11-03 Thread stardiviner
I want to set different index_format for different mails. Just like set different index_format for different mailbox. Like this example: folder-hook "\!"set index_format = '"%H %C| %N [%4Z] %-13L » %s %> %4c"' folder-hook =INBOX set index_format = '"➤ %H %C| ✣%N [%4Z] %-13L » %s %

Re: mailcap entry for html - escaping spaces

2011-11-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Nov2011 17:07, Tim Johnson wrote: | Cameron, thanks for those explanations. | I have not yet installed your css package. Been really busy here. | Will try to get to it tomorrow or saturday. | This is fun. And informative. No worries, whenever. | BTW: This pythonist has notices

Re: mailcap entry for html - escaping spaces

2011-11-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* Cameron Simpson [03 11:47]: > On 03Nov2011 07:55, Tim Johnson wrote: > > That sounds right. Taking the latter case first, mutt gets the environment > because your login shell has build the environment before mutt gets > invoked. > > For the former case, mutt gets invoked possibly directly

Re: Named tags/lables?

2011-11-03 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi David! On Do, 03 Nov 2011, David Champion wrote: > * On 03 Nov 2011, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > On 03Nov2011 10:05, Edward Morbius wrote: > > | Is there any facility similar to Gmail's named tags (other than > > | folders) for mutt? > > | > > | I'd like to be able to add (multiple) labels t

Re: Translate emails to English

2011-11-03 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi SK! On Mi, 02 Nov 2011, SK wrote: > libtranslate looks like the way to go but being a newbie I am > struggling to figure out how to hook it to mutt. Any help? Either define a macro, that pipes the message through translate, or even use your mailcap file to specify how to translate your messa

Re: Named tags/lables?

2011-11-03 Thread Jostein Berntsen
On 03.11.11,10:05, Edward Morbius wrote: > Is there any facility similar to Gmail's named tags (other than > folders) for mutt? > > I'd like to be able to add (multiple) labels to a given message, > possible automatically (procmail, some imap tool, mutt folder hooks), > have mutt be aware of defin

Re: Named tags/lables?

2011-11-03 Thread David Champion
* On 03 Nov 2011, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 03Nov2011 10:05, Edward Morbius wrote: > | Is there any facility similar to Gmail's named tags (other than > | folders) for mutt? > | > | I'd like to be able to add (multiple) labels to a given message, > | possible automatically (procmail, some imap

Re: Named tags/lables?

2011-11-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Nov2011 10:05, Edward Morbius wrote: | Is there any facility similar to Gmail's named tags (other than | folders) for mutt? | | I'd like to be able to add (multiple) labels to a given message, | possible automatically (procmail, some imap tool, mutt folder hooks), | have mutt be aware of def

Re: mailcap entry for html - escaping spaces

2011-11-03 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Nov2011 07:55, Tim Johnson wrote: | * Cameron Simpson [02 18:51]: | > Ok, now running iTerm2. How do you invoke mutt then? A special iterm2 | > profile or something else? | | I just use /opt/local/bin/mutt as the command in a profile. | I can also launch mutt directly from the defaul

Re: mailcap entry for html - escaping spaces

2011-11-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* Tim Johnson [03 08:15]: > * Cameron Simpson [02 18:51]: > > | | > This discrepancy is odd, and a little troubling. We probably need to > > | | > investigate that a little. > > | | I think this has to do with the way that iTerm2 passes the > > | | environment to mutt... but I am just

Named tags/lables?

2011-11-03 Thread Edward Morbius
Is there any facility similar to Gmail's named tags (other than folders) for mutt? I'd like to be able to add (multiple) labels to a given message, possible automatically (procmail, some imap tool, mutt folder hooks), have mutt be aware of defined labels, and be able to quickly filter messages by

Re: mailcap entry for html - escaping spaces

2011-11-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* Cameron Simpson [02 18:51]: > | | > This discrepancy is odd, and a little troubling. We probably need to > | | > investigate that a little. > | | I think this has to do with the way that iTerm2 passes the > | | environment to mutt... but I am just guessing. > | > | Hmm. I'm using iTerm