Re: text/html mailcap entry not used

2011-04-11 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Christian, I did indeed upgrade from 1.5.20 to 1.5.21. I've rebound v to view-mailcap and now everything works as expected. Thanks, Viktor Christian Ebert wrote: > * Viktor Rosenfeld on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 at 00:48:22 +0200 > > I'm having problems opening text/html MIME attachments in G

Re: text/html mailcap entry not used

2011-04-11 Thread Christian Ebert
* Chip Camden on Monday, April 11, 2011 at 15:56:52 -0700 > I think you need a semi-colon at the end of each line of your .mailcap. Nah, you don't. I think it's about using view-mailcap instead of view-attach. c -- Was heißt hier Dogma, ich bin Underdogma! [ What the hell do you mean dogma, I

Re: text/html mailcap entry not used

2011-04-11 Thread Christian Ebert
* Viktor Rosenfeld on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 at 00:48:22 +0200 > I'm having problems opening text/html MIME attachments in Google Chrome > (or Safari) on OS X 10.6. (The same setup [with some different paths] > works on a 10.5 machine, but I think OS X is not the culprit.) > > I have the followi

Re: text/html mailcap entry not used

2011-04-11 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Viktor Rosenfeld on Tuesday, 12 April 2011: > Hi everybody, > > I'm having problems opening text/html MIME attachments in Google Chrome > (or Safari) on OS X 10.6. (The same setup [with some different paths] > works on a 10.5 machine, but I think OS X is not the culprit.) > > I have the fo

text/html mailcap entry not used

2011-04-11 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi everybody, I'm having problems opening text/html MIME attachments in Google Chrome (or Safari) on OS X 10.6. (The same setup [with some different paths] works on a 10.5 machine, but I think OS X is not the culprit.) I have the following mailcap (excerpt): text/html; ~/unix/bin/view_attachm

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Gray
On Apr 11, 2011 at 10:44 PM +0200, Richard wrote: yes, I am also modifying editor per recipient. At least I did it for this and some other experiments. Often I call the editor through some content/formatting wrapper. Ahh ok. Other than that I have little understanding what and how text_flowed

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Richard
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:42:23PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Richard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would > > seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried > > > > send-hook . 'set text_flowed=no'

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Richard
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:08:50PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > As I understand it, setting $text_flowed doesn't actually change the > content of your mail at all; it only changes a header alerting the > recipients to the fact that the message is f=f, *even if it's not*. > The actually act of providin

Re: imap port lenght

2011-04-11 Thread mimosinnet
El dilluns, 11 de abril del 2011 a les 09:39, Michael Elkins va escriure: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:14:56AM +0200, mimosin...@gmail.com wrote: > >Is there any limit to the port length in an imap url? > > > >My email server is configured at port 52003. If I use this url: > > > >imaps://llistes.g

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Gray
On Apr 08, 2011 at 01:39 PM +0200, Richard wrote: I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried I guess I'm not clear about why you wouldn't just send format=flowed text to every recipient and avoid this altogether. If your

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Will Fiveash
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Richard wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would > seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried > > send-hook . 'set text_flowed=no' > send-hook '~t username' 'set text_flowed=yes' > > to my surprise, this

Re: imap port lenght

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Singer X.J. Wang wrote: Ports are unsigned 2 byte integers.. I was pointing out that the error message when the port was unable to be parsed does not occur when parsing 52003. The 520039 was there on purpose to demonstrate what error message is print

Re: imap port lenght

2011-04-11 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:14:56AM +0200, mimosin...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any limit to the port length in an imap url? My email server is configured at port 52003. If I use this url: imaps://llistes.generatech.org:52003 I get an error about not being a valid url. On the other hand, if I u

Re: imap port lenght

2011-04-11 Thread Leo Vegoda
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:14:56AM +0200, mimosin...@gmail.com wrote: > Is there any limit to the port length in an imap url? > > My email server is configured at port 52003. If I use this url: > > imaps://llistes.generatech.org:52003 > > I get an error about not being a valid url. On the other

imap port lenght

2011-04-11 Thread mimosinnet
Is there any limit to the port length in an imap url? My email server is configured at port 52003. If I use this url: imaps://llistes.generatech.org:52003 I get an error about not being a valid url. On the other hand, if I use imaps://llistes.generatech.org:5200 I get connection refused. Cou