Re: Up to date version of trash patch?

2010-09-22 Thread Joel Dahl
On 15-09-2010 23:29, seanh wrote: > Is there an up-to-date version of the trash folder patch, one that is > known to work with mutt 1.5.20/21? FWIW, I still think this should be part of mutt. Users coming from other MUA's (especially the ones with a fancy GUI) will most likely expect this functio

Re: GPG - Mailing list encryption

2010-09-22 Thread christoph
* Am So, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:02:36 +0200 , schrieb the.real.ka...@gmail.com: > * christoph [Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:53:55PM +0200] > > * Am Do, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:51:38 +0200 , schrieb the.real.ka...@gmail.com: > > > Hello list, > > > > > > I am somehow clueless, I searched the web a lot regarding

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Elkins
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:30:18PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote: following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice with mutt's SMTP support (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=128493280217503&w=2), I have now encountered a problem with IMAP access to the same server. Thi

Re: Up to date version of trash patch?

2010-09-22 Thread seanh
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:56:35PM +0100, Athanasius wrote: > Doing an 'apt-get source mutt' on a Debian/stable system and then > checking mutt-1.5.20/debian/patches I found features/trash-folder. > > File attached (and if this list strips that then it's at: > >

Re: $tunnel and $smtp_url

2010-09-22 Thread E. Prom
On Wednesday, 22 September 2010, 11:35:29 +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: > poll yandex.ru via pop.yandex.ru proto POP3 uidl > ... > user 'xrgtn' ... options ssl sslfingerprint > "9F:FF:98:8E:72:20:8B:47:F5:AA:D9:8B:92:AA:22:FE" > I also have "ssl sslproto ssl3 sslcertck" in > options for

Re: Stuck on 97% changing mailboxes

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Williams
On 20 Sep 2010, at 12:30, Michael Williams wrote: > Hi, > > following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice > with mutt's SMTP support > (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=128493280217503&w=2), I have now > encountered a problem with IMAP access to the same server. Thi

Re: $tunnel and $smtp_url

2010-09-22 Thread Alexander Gattin
Hello, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:35:29AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: > Then, there are solutions with transparent > SOCKS/HTTP proxying without changing firewall > rules on originating host, but relying upon some > LD_LIBRARY_PRELOAD-based socksifier instead. e.g. socksify from dante-client p

Re: $tunnel and $smtp_url

2010-09-22 Thread Alexander Gattin
Hello, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:32:28AM +0200, E. Prom wrote: > In fact I felt like having a cold shower when I > discovered that fetchmail and my IRC client > don't check the validity of the server's > certificate, allowing mitm. I used fetchmail several years ago and I still have my .fetchmai