Hi,
I try to use $tunnel with $smtp_url, but can't manage to do it.
I don't trust my wifi Internet connection, so I want my mail to pass
through a ssh tunnel to a server I own, before reaching the smtp server.
ME ---(smtp inside ssh)---> my_server ---(smtp)---> smtp_server.
I don't own smtp_ser
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:38:16PM +0200, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> > On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
>
> > Do "H" and look at the headers and you'll see under References:
> > <20100919012315.gc36...@fbsd.t60.cpu> <20100919071840.ga26...@murdoc>
> >
* On 20 Sep 2010, Marco Giusti wrote:
>
> I got another idea that uses mutt's thread capability. I test it but i
> didn't create a macro (because I'm lazy) and I leave it to you as exercise.
I have used this technique before. It works well.
> Uncollapse all threads (Esc+V), tag all messages (
On 20 Sep 2010, at 16:36, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Do you know if mutt logs somewhere the SMTP dialog with the remote
> server? I found nothing in the docs about...
Run "mutt -d2". Server chat is then logged in ~/.muttdebug*. Increase the
number 2 to larger numbers for more detail.
(This assumes
El día Friday, September 17, 2010 a las 04:44:46PM +0200, Luciano Rocha
escribió:
> > which put the mail to the local queue and the sendmail queue runner
> > later to the SMTP smarterhost (of my ISP). So far so good. In some cases
> > I would send the mail directly with SMTP to the destination, b
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Marco Giusti wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:36:02PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> [...]
> > P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> > reliable than the ~s Re: way?
>
> I got another idea that uses mutt's thread capability. I test
On 10.09.20, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> Do "H" and look at the headers and you'll see under References:
> <20100919012315.gc36...@fbsd.t60.cpu> <20100919071840.ga26...@murdoc>
> etc.
>
"In-Reply-To:" is also used.
Kind regards
Michael
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:36:02PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
[...]
> P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> reliable than the ~s Re: way?
I got another idea that uses mutt's thread capability. I test it but i
didn't create a macro (because I'm lazy) and I leave it to you a
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:02:06PM +0200, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> > P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> > reliable than the ~s Re: way?
>
> For correct threads, i.e. if the user hasn't chosen to use just the
> subject line, it u
On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> reliable than the ~s Re: way?
For correct threads, i.e. if the user hasn't chosen to use just the
subject line, it uses "References:" which refer to the message-id of the
mail(s) to which it is respon
I don't know if it helps or applies to you, but I was unable
to get the colors to work, but the devil is in the details.
I was running on Solaris 10/x86 and installed mutt from
the sunfreeware pre-built.
No luck with colors under 1.5.17 but no problems at all with 1.5.20
with a lot of the issue
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:18:40AM +0200, Marco Giusti wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:23:15AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > As title, I want to keep all of the topics, but delete all of the
> > others.
>
> You can tag/search/delete responses using an heuristic expression, the
> s
Hi,
following on from problems getting a new Exchange 2010 server to play nice with
mutt's SMTP support (http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=128493280217503&w=2), I
have now encountered a problem with IMAP access to the same server. This
problem is unique to mutt and is not displayed by other mail
13 matches
Mail list logo
