Re: Is there a modernized procmail?

On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 07:08:18AM +0800, Yue Wu wrote: > Hi, list, > > Is there one modernized procmail? The biggest complain on procmail is that it > doesn't support multibyte charactors at all(w/o dirty trick). Or maybe there > is one better replacement for filtering the mails? I'm seaking the

Is there a modernized procmail?

Hi, list, Is there one modernized procmail? The biggest complain on procmail is that it doesn't support multibyte charactors at all(w/o dirty trick). Or maybe there is one better replacement for filtering the mails? I'm seaking the infos to make my mutt work with imap(offlineimap?). -- Regards,