Just to be clear, I'm still *NOT* saying that mbox is inherently
better than mbox. That said...
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 02:25:01PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> Despite this, it is interesting to note that UW-IMAP mostly
> outperforms Courier on low-end hardware *by a lot*, with the sole
> excepti
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 08:41:01AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> But if you're here to rehash the "fast" argument, I think we can't get
> anywhere without pointing to the CourierMTA's webpage of mbox/maildir
> benchmarks: http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/
I'm very familiar with this pag
* Ionel Mugurel Ciobica on Friday, December 25, 2009 at 19:49:59 +0100
> On 25-12-2009, at 16h 24'34", Christian Ebert wrote about "Re: How to count
> new emails in mbox format mailbox?"
>> find $mailhier -type f -size 0 -exec rm -f \{} \;
This works for me[tm] though. From a script. And I checke
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 04:22:34PM +, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Wu, Yue on Friday, December 25, 2009 at 21:12:52 +0800
> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:56:44AM +, Christian Ebert wrote:
> >> egrep '^From [-a-za-z0-9@[-a-za-z0-9]+\.[a-za-z0-9]+ [A-Z][a-z]{2}
> >> [A-Z][a-z]{2} [ 1-3][0-9
