Re: Send mails to Exchange problem

2009-12-21 Thread Jostein Berntsen
> Hi, > > If I try to send mails to my company that uses Exchange, the mails are > sent but disappears somewhere at the receiver. This does not happen when > if I send the same mail. Anyone knows what happens here? > > - Jostein > > -- > Jostein Berntsen > Can there be some field in the

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Ionel Mugurel Ciobica
On 22-12-2009, at 01h 02'46", Andreas Kneib wrote about "Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?" > * Mun schrieb am Montag, den 21. Dezember 2009: > > >1) Is Fetchmail still in "vogue"? Or is there a better application > >that I should use to retrieve my e-mail? > > I like mpop: > http://mpop

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Mun [12-21-09 18:55]: > > Due to my own personality flaws I am planning on using Fetchmail > (configured for IMAP use) to retrieve my e-mail from the Exchange server > to my local Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) box. The main reason for > this is that I want a copy of all of my e-mail to re

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Jamie Griffin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:02:46AM +0100, Andreas Kneib wrote: > I like mpop: > http://mpop.sourceforge.net/ > http://mpop.sourceforge.net/comparison.html offlineimap is also pretty good and well worth checking out. Jamie pgpGqAhqY7Gbn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: no way to view html part in browser

2009-12-21 Thread Adam Spiers
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 08:28:00AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Wednesday, September 23 at 03:08 PM, quoth Louis-David Mitterrand: > >Using debian's mutt 1.5.20-4 I can no longer view the html part of a > >message in a graphical browser (firefox). > > Sure you can; it's just that the default be

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Noah Sheppard
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 03:59:41PM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > Take a look at Getmail. I've found it to be a much better retrieval > program than Fetchmail. Could you expound on why you prefer getmail over fetchmail? I am currently using fetchmail and have only heard of getmail but not seen it i

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2009-12-21, Mun wrote: > Hi all, > > My e-mail methodology will be changing shortly and I will be serviced > via an Exchange server (as opposed to e-mail delivered directly to my > Linux workstation). > > Due to my own personality flaws I am planning on using Fetchmail > (configured for IMAP

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Andreas Kneib
* Mun schrieb am Montag, den 21. Dezember 2009: >1) Is Fetchmail still in "vogue"? Or is there a better application >that I should use to retrieve my e-mail? > I like mpop: http://mpop.sourceforge.net/ http://mpop.sourceforge.net/comparison.html Andreas

Re: Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Rem P Roberti
On 2009.12.21 15:54:36 +, Mun wrote: > Hi all, > > My e-mail methodology will be changing shortly and I will be serviced > via an Exchange server (as opposed to e-mail delivered directly to my > Linux workstation). > > Due to my own personality flaws I am planning on using Fetchmail > (config

Is Fetchmail still in vogue?

2009-12-21 Thread Mun
Hi all, My e-mail methodology will be changing shortly and I will be serviced via an Exchange server (as opposed to e-mail delivered directly to my Linux workstation). Due to my own personality flaws I am planning on using Fetchmail (configured for IMAP use) to retrieve my e-mail from the Exchang

Send mails to Exchange problem

2009-12-21 Thread Jostein Berntsen
Hi, If I try to send mails to my company that uses Exchange, the mails are sent but disappears somewhere at the receiver. This does not happen when if I send the same mail. Anyone knows what happens here? - Jostein -- Jostein Berntsen

Re: Easy way to handle multiple accounts?

2009-12-21 Thread Joost Kremers
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:10:35PM +, chombee wrote: > That means that for every variable I set in a muttrc.accountX file > (and I have several of these files) I have to include a default case > in the master muttrc file, or I'll get unexpected behaviour. This is > a recipe for disaster, at som