On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:14:08PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote:
> * Nicolas KOWALSKI 21.11.2009
>
> > Sometimes I receive mail replies with the "RE : "
> > string as subject. This "RE : " is apparently not recognized by the
> > default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of ma
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:48:30PM -0700, RobertHoltzman wrote:
>
> My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject
> line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing?
Check out "strict_threads" in the muttrc manual.
--
Monte
Hei hei,
> My understanding is that threading has nothing to do with the subject
> line. If it did threads couldn't be hijacked. What am I missing?
Maybe the following mail headers: Message-ID, References and In-Reply-To.
Greets
Alex
--
»With the first link, the chain is forged. The first spee
* Nicolas KOWALSKI 21.11.2009
> Sometimes I receive mail replies with the "RE : "
> string as subject. This "RE : " is apparently not recognized by the
> default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail,
> mutt add another "Re: " in front of the subject line; furthermore,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:29:18PM +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sometimes I receive mail replies with the "RE : "
> string as subject. This "RE : " is apparently not recognized by the
> default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail,
> mutt add another "Re:
Hello,
Sometimes I receive mail replies with the "RE : "
string as subject. This "RE : " is apparently not recognized by the
default reply_regexp value, because when I reply to this kind of mail,
mutt add another "Re: " in front of the subject line; furthermore, the
threading is broken.
Inste
> The problem with your using nano is you not being satisfied with it's
> formatting abilities. So, a different editor or ??
First, thanks for the various remarks, and I'm sorry I was not always
clear.
The bottom line, however comes here. Nano apparently cannot refill a
block of marked text,
