Re: mailbox list problem

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Holtzman
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:38:10AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Sunday, August 9 at 09:14 PM, quoth Robert Holtzman: >> The problem was that I stupidly modified the list of mail lists to >> duplicate the list of mailboxes. When I went back and realized what I >> had done I restored both list

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 10/08/09 16:44 +0200 - Michael Tatge: >> there is no automatic way to execute "$". i.e. save changes to >> mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your >> internet connection (e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually means losing >> mailbox changes. > >No, there isn't. And tha

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, August 10 at 01:27 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: >On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:11:27PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> On Monday, August 10 at 12:34 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: >> >> If you want such a feature you always make a macro that does that. >

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:11:27PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, August 10 at 12:34 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: > >> If you want such a feature you always make a macro that does that. > >> e.g. macro index > > > >mutt errors on this macro. > > That's because it's incomplete. You have to in

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Monday, August 10 at 12:34 PM, quoth Marc Vaillant: >> If you want such a feature you always make a macro that does that. >> e.g. macro index > >mutt errors on this macro. That's because it's incomplete. You have to insert whatever key you norm

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 09:23AM -0400 Marc Vaillant > * (vaill...@fastmail.fm) muttered: > > there is no automatic way to execute "$". i.e. save changes to > > mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your > > i

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 09:23AM -0400 Marc Vaillant > * (vaill...@fastmail.fm) muttered: > > there is no automatic way to execute "$". i.e. save changes to > > mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your > > i

Re: Signature

2009-08-10 Thread Paul Grinberg
Worked! Thanks! Best, Paul -Original Message- From: owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org [mailto:owner-mutt-us...@mutt.org] On Behalf Of Christian Brabandt Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:56 AM To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: Signature Hi Paul! On Mo, 10 Aug 2009, Paul Grinberg wrote: > E

Re: Signature

2009-08-10 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi Paul! On Mo, 10 Aug 2009, Paul Grinberg wrote: > Every time signature is appended after part below (at the end of the > e-mail) > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:28:53AM -0400, wrote: > >bla bla bla > > How to make it so signature will appear "before" the above part? You are looking for

Signature

2009-08-10 Thread Paul Grinberg
Hi, Have the following problem. Every time signature is appended after part below (at the end of the e-mail) On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:28:53AM -0400, wrote: >bla bla bla How to make it so signature will appear "before" the above part? Best, Paul

Re: why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 09:23AM -0400 Marc Vaillant * (vaill...@fastmail.fm) muttered: > there is no automatic way to execute "$". i.e. save changes to > mailbox. This is particularly a problem for IMAP because losing your > internet connection (e.g. sleeping your laptop) usually means losing > mai

why is there no auto $ (save changes to mailbox)?

2009-08-10 Thread Marc Vaillant
Hi all, I've been a happy mutt user for over a decade. Of course there are a few minor features here and there that I wish mutt had. The one that's really getting to me lately is that as far as I know, there is no automatic way to execute "$". i.e. save changes to mailbox. This is particularly

Power send-hooking [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for me ]

2009-08-10 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:17:20PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Saturday, August 8 at 01:55 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: > > Well, I've gone back for the third time, to check what happens on > > compose (m), and list reply (L). In my now disused cross-gcc > > mailbox, with no send-hook and no