Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Saturday, August 8 at 01:55 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: > Well, I've gone back for the third time, to check what happens on > compose (m), and list reply (L). In my now disused cross-gcc > mailbox, with no send-hook and no "Reply-To:" in the t

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hi, > The do it... :) In mutt, you can even set $signature to a pipe, i.e. > a script that gets the signature as argument and prints it with BOM: > > set signature="script.sh signature|" That's what I did now, wrote a script strip-bom.pl which removes the BOM from the beginning of the signatur

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > As to where it comes from, the character is in the signature file. I > > wouldn't expect the MUA to remove characters from the signature file. > > Not in general, but this one is special. ;-) Not from mutt's view. > > Why is it

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Rocco Rutte
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:11:58AM -0600, lee wrote: > Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not > seeing a special character in the signature. Yes, it's just that this one has zero width and there mutt ignores it (as it does for 0x200b). Rocco

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:21:22AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Friday, August 7 at 08:09 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen: > Hmmm. I think there must be a misunderstanding between us somewhere > here. If you're happy, that's great, and nevermind the rest. But > unless I misunderstand how mutt wor

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hi, > Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not > seeing a special character in the signature. Why should it not be? At least it corrupts the correct signature coloring in my mutt. Haven't tried this with other mail clients yet. > As to where it comes from, the characte

Re: UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread lee
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:52:10PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > > 24 Alexander Dahl, Staff Engineer > > This is the same signature you should see below and you should also find > this special character in it. Is it possible to use this character in the body of a mail? I'm not seeing a specia

UTF-8 signatures with BOM

2009-08-07 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hi there, up to today I had just one signature file in the plain old place ~/.signature which I edited on the system I used mutt. For my other mail clients I have a bunch of different signature files in a VCS to use the same files with different clients (actually several instances of Mozilla Thund

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, August 7 at 08:09 PM, quoth Erik Christiansen: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: >> On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: >> Consider if you were instead changing the Subject header. For

Re: send-hook built to fail? [Was: Re: send2-hook not working for

2009-08-07 Thread Erik Christiansen
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Friday, August 7 at 01:52 AM, quoth Erik Christiansen: > Consider if you were instead changing the Subject header. For example: > > send-hook '~C d...@example.com' 'my_hdr Subject: [dudemail]' Munging that a bit, I seem to b

Re: How to cope with a mailing list that uses two addresses?

2009-08-07 Thread Chris G
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > > The 'harvesting script' is my own, written in python so is easy enough > to change. I'll think about this idea too, thanks. > That was the right way to go, a fairly simple change to the script that produces my 'lists' and 'subscribe'