-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You *might* be able to restore it, *if* you use an alternate temp
directory (i.e. if you set the $TMP environment variable, or the
$tmpdir muttrc configuration setting, or maybe if your editor keeps
draft files in a nonstandard place).
Here, I'll w
Hi,
today I started to write a mail, stopped (= postponed), resumed
writing and - experienced a short power outage. No problem so
far, but after booting my machine again, I can't find the mail.
It's not in the "postponed" file anymore. So my question is:
Where can I find my mail resp. how can I re
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:42:13AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Thursday, March 19 at 09:19 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin:
> >Any ideas?
>
> Unfortunately, no... I think you need to take that to the
> mutt-...@mutt.org list.
OK, well I appreciate the effort. I'll also try the freebsd lists.
- jt
Okay, I still don't understand why my folder-hook did not work. Just
like setting the hostname has to be done very early. If someone is
interested in my muttrc as to why that is, I will post it here.
On the other hand, working with folder-hooks in conjunction with my
newsserver works perfectly no
Hello Rocco,
Rocco [19.Mär.2009 13:25]:
You probably want something like:
folder-hook . 'set record="^"'
folder-hook ^news 'set record="=articles"'
which would store all copies of outgoing articles to $folder/articles
mailbox.
Your suggestion works perfectly, thank you!
folder-h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 19 at 10:42 AM, quoth David Champion:
> I think the best summary is that IMAP is a remote mailbox access
> protocol, supporting all common mailbox operations at the protocol
> level. POP is not: it supports full message retrieval,
I think the best summary is that IMAP is a remote mailbox access
protocol, supporting all common mailbox operations at the protocol
level. POP is not: it supports full message retrieval, new-message scan
(kind of, via UIDL), and deletion. This makes it, at best, a queued
message pull protocol.
B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 19 at 09:19 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin:
>Any ideas?
Unfortunately, no... I think you need to take that to the
mutt-...@mutt.org list.
~Kyle
- --
I know that there are people who do not love their fellow man, and I
hate people like
Any ideas?
- jt
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:07:00PM -0600, Joshua Tinnin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:18:30AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 11 at 10:36 AM, quoth Joshua Tinnin:
> > >Here it is:
> > >
> > >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > >0x080cb
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:06:16AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Thursday, March 19 at 09:21 AM, quoth Marc Vaillant:
> >> Sorry, but I think, here you are wrong. Good IMAP-Clients don’t
> >> download the attachments without your interaction (at least you can
> >> configure them in such a way).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 19 at 09:21 AM, quoth Marc Vaillant:
>> Sorry, but I think, here you are wrong. Good IMAP-Clients don’t
>> download the attachments without your interaction (at least you can
>> configure them in such a way). So the reading of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 18 at 09:14 PM, quoth John J. Foster:
>On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:13:19PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> and IMAP makes it possible for me to sue my own client when I can.
>
>I'm so glad you're not my lawyer.
HA! Whoops, typo. :D
~
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:23:30AM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:06:14AM +, Chris G wrote:
>> Are they on your LAN? Using IMAP across the internet (even with a
>> good ADSL connection) can never really be as quick as a local mbox
>> spool, especially if you're dealin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:34:18PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Depends. Most people using IMAP use it through IMAP providers which
> "guarantee" you 24/7 availability. You mostly have professional admins
> who do the work for you and ensure you have access to mail. With local
> management, that wou
Hi,
* JP Bruns wrote:
I am using mutt v1.5.16 with nntp patch (as supplied by gentoo-linux)
and have some questions regarding the setup or muttrc-file.
First of all, I am not able to post to any newsgroup when the following
folder-hook is in effect:
folder-hook . 'set record="^"'
I o
Hello,
I am using mutt v1.5.16 with nntp patch (as supplied by gentoo-linux)
and have some questions regarding the setup or muttrc-file.
First of all, I am not able to post to any newsgroup when the following
folder-hook is in effect:
folder-hook . 'set record="^"'
I only get this erro
Hi,
* Chris G wrote:
On
the other hand if you *don't* need to access mail from anywhere then
IMAP is slower than other ways of doing it and doesn't add any other
particular advantages.
Depends. Most people using IMAP use it through IMAP providers which
"guarantee" you 24/7 availability. You m
Hi,
* Joost Kremers wrote:
so the "leave mail on server" option that most pop-clients have is
certainly not a convenient way to access your mail remotely from different
locations.
Plus: POP needs locking, i.e. only one client at a time can access the
mailbox which implies that tools should no
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:32:23AM +0100, Joost Kremers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:06:14AM +, Chris G wrote:
> > Are they on your LAN? Using IMAP across the internet (even with a
> > good ADSL connection) can never really be as quick as a local mbox
> > spool, especially if you're dea
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:23:30AM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:06:14AM +, Chris G wrote:
>> Are they on your LAN? Using IMAP across the internet (even with a
>> good ADSL connection) can never really be as quick as a local mbox
>> spool, especially if you're dealin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:06:14AM +, Chris G wrote:
> Are they on your LAN? Using IMAP across the internet (even with a
> good ADSL connection) can never really be as quick as a local mbox
> spool, especially if you're dealing with attachments and such. Think
> about it - a 1Mbyte attachment
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:06:14AM +, Chris G wrote:
Are they on your LAN? Using IMAP across the internet (even with a
good ADSL connection) can never really be as quick as a local mbox
spool, especially if you're dealing with attachments and such. Think
about it - a 1Mbyte attachment is go
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:02:12AM +, Chris G wrote:
> *By default* in both cases. There's nothing that actually forces you
> to leave mail on an IMAP server, neither is there anything that forces
> you to remove mail when you download it from a POP3 server. However
> most POP3 services expec
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:01:14AM +0100, Joost Kremers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Henrik Enberg wrote:
> > The main drawback, and the mainreason I don't use it directly is that
> > unless you run a local server with the low latency that gives you,
> > it's just too slow. 1
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:06:12AM +0100, Joost Kremers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:51:56PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > Another meta-question, where can I find a straight-forward description of
> > imap, without the enthusiastic pushing? What is it?
>
> it's just a protocol to access e
25 matches
Mail list logo
