Quoting tchomby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It's a shame the sidebar patch is so problematic. What do mutt users
> who don't use the sidebar patch do instead?
I have about 10 or 15 mailinglists delivered directly to my ~/Maildir
using Exim. With 'Exim Filters', messages get filtered to the correct
'fol
Michael Kjorling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 28 Oct 2008 14:53 -0700, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I am going to a different place for couple months where the network
> > bandwidth is very poor. Ssh+mutt will not be very responsive. So I am
> > looking at programs that would sync
On 28 Oct 2008 14:53 -0700, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I am going to a different place for couple months where the network
> bandwidth is very poor. Ssh+mutt will not be very responsive. So I am
> looking at programs that would synchronize two maildirs. Looked at isync
> (mbsync) b
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:19:38PM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote:
> * Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20081028 21:07]:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote:
> > > As long as you specify your mailfolders with "mailboxes", you can use
> > > "c" or "y" to change to a fo
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:04:37PM +0100, Anders Karlsson wrote:
> mutt 1.5.18; use "set nomark_old"
>
> Works with imap(s), maildir and mbox. I have it running here. ;-)
> What I have not tried is MH folders, because I have never had a reason
> to.
I'm quite sure you're mistaken:
:set ?nomark_o
Instead of rsync what about unison? Unison allows for two-way syncs.
So then you can configure mutt to use the new mail box format where a separate
file is created for each email (as opposed to one file for everything). And
then run unison to sync the two directories.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 0
++ 28/10/08 14:53 -0700 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>I am going to a different place for couple months where the network
>bandwidth is very poor. Ssh+mutt will not be very responsive. So I am
>looking at programs that would synchronize two maildirs. Looked at isync
>(mbsync) but that seems to need an IMAP
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:42:35PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 28 at 06:01 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >Andrew Haninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > So I am looking at programs that would synchronize two ma
