Re: Macro for marking as read and then deleting not doing the

2008-08-15 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 15 at 09:18 PM, quoth Sean Whitton: > macro pager \Cd '' > > The message is marked as deleted and I am taken from the pager back to > the index, but on loading up my account through my webmail the message > has been deleted (archive

Macro for marking as read and then deleting not doing the former

2008-08-15 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, I'm relatively new to mutt but am getting into it gradually. I've hooked it up to my Gmail account via IMAP and this is working fine. However, I have the following macro that isn't working: macro pager \Cd '' The message is marked as deleted and I am taken from the pager back to the index

Re: Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, August 15 at 03:17 AM, quoth dae3: > Granted, I'm using an old-ish version (1.4.2.2i) but I'll report this > just in case newer releases are still misbehaving. > > In short, Mutt sent my email and then chucked it into bit-heaven because >

Re: Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread Marianne Promberger
On Friday, 15 August 2008, 10:10 (UTC+0200), dae3 wrote: > > BTW, the invalid Fcc I had specified was '.' (what I was trying to say > was "put it in the friggin' current mailbox!" - there *should* be a > quick way to say this, in case there still isn't). folder-hook . 'set record="^"' I don't kn

Re: Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* dae3 on Friday, August 15, 2008 at 03:17:13 +0200 > BTW, the invalid Fcc I had specified was '.' (what I was trying to say > was "put it in the current friggin' mailbox!" - there *should* be a > quick way to say this, in case there still isn't). There is: '^' (w/o quotes) c -- Was heißt hier

Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread dae3
Granted, I'm using an old-ish version (1.4.2.2i) but I'll report this just in case newer releases are still misbehaving. In short, Mutt sent my email and then chucked it into bit-heaven because I had specified an invalid Fcc. That's bad! Very bad!! A nicer behaviour would have been backing up my

Mutt devnulled my message!

2008-08-15 Thread dae3
Granted, I'm using an old-ish version (1.4.2.2i) but I'll report this just in case newer releases are still misbehaving. In short, Mutt sent my email and then chucked it into bit-heaven because I had specified an invalid Fcc. That's bad! Very bad!! A nicer behaviour would have been backing up my

Re: help with formulating a better macro

2008-08-15 Thread Rado S
=- Kevin Beranek wrote on Thu 14.Aug'08 at 16:59:27 -0500 -= > > Set edit_headers=yes and detour $editor to a script of yours > > dealing with the necessary header changes, and reset $editor to > > the default after the mail was sent, no need to touch so many > > other mutt interal vars you'd have

Re: robots [ was Re: Alternative Identities ]:wq

2008-08-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2008-07-17 23:50:15, schrieb Ken Moffat: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:32:46PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > I have the following in my .muttrc: > > > > Question for people who post here more frequently than I do - is it > normal to get a challenge/response mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] w