On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:10:45PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> But you're asking for "proof that it reached us as the recipient" for
> multiple recipients apparently, with a *single* acknowledgement.
> That's just not possible in any sort of system.
No. You get me wrong, repeatedly. I'm asking for a "
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:58:16PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 04:30:44PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > But as I understand it in most 'normal' MUAs if you have "one address
> > for several people" then it's split into separate messages at the
> > sender end of things and
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 04:30:44PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> But as I understand it in most 'normal' MUAs if you have "one address
> for several people" then it's split into separate messages at the
> sender end of things and from then on is simply a separate message to
> each recipient.
But in whic
On 2007-10-13, Felix 'buebo' Kakrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm using mutt 1.5.16 with the sidebar patch and I'd like to use the ctrl +
> the arrow keys to move around in the sidebar.
>
> I've tried this in ~/.muttrc
>
> bind index \Csidebar-prev
> bind index \C sidebar-next
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-13-07 12:01]:
> Like most folks I have separate recipes and mailboxes for my most frequently
> received
> email. I also created a recipe for email addressed to me for which there
> is no specific mailbox. That
Hello,
I'm using mutt 1.5.16 with the sidebar patch and I'd like to use the ctrl +
the arrow keys to move around in the sidebar.
I've tried this in ~/.muttrc
bind index \Csidebar-prev
bind index \C sidebar-next
bind index \C sidebar-open
but it doesn't work. Quotes don't change anything.
A
Like most folks I have separate recipes and mailboxes for my most frequently
received
email. I also created a recipe for email addressed to me for which there
is no specific mailbox. That mail is directed to #HOME/Mail/inbox.
What is happening in some cases is that email that has a proprietary
m
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 04:13:11PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> > Surely if a mail is sent to (say) ten recipients it's pretty useless
> > to know that it got to just one of them. If all ten recipients had
>
> Eh.. no?! If you send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, October 13 at 12:50 PM, quoth Patrick Schoenfeld:
>On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:35:02PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> Thus, any message that does not have an X-Disposition-Sent header is a
>> message that you haven't sent a response to, and
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 01:37:13PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> Surely if a mail is sent to (say) ten recipients it's pretty useless
> to know that it got to just one of them. If all ten recipients had
Eh.. no?! If you send it to 10 different recipients, with each representing a
different role, then y
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:58:52PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 01:14:07PM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> > 8.12: How to send an auto-reply back when someone posts?
>
> thanks for that hint, but actually a auto-reply is not appropriate. I need
> something to actually
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 01:14:07PM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> 8.12: How to send an auto-reply back when someone posts?
thanks for that hint, but actually a auto-reply is not appropriate. I need
something to actually confirm, because someone might already have sent it out.
In another part of the t
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 02:06:44PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Oh, come on, the "appropriate docs" would be the *mutt* documentation,
> of course! Can we possibly ask a more vague or open-ended question?
Haha! If it would be so obvious I wouldn't have asked, hu? Take for granted
that I had a loo
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:35:02PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> Thus, any message that does not have an X-Disposition-Sent header is a
> message that you haven't sent a response to, and messages that DO have
> such a header won't trigger the macro.
That does not work (at least in my case) becaus
sorry, send error
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:30:47PM +0800, liupeng wrote:
> vimperator version: 0.5.2
> i want to use document.body in .vimperatorrc, load .vimperatorrc no error
> --
> xxx = function() {
> ...
> ...document.body...
> ...
> }
> --
vimperator version: 0.5.2
i want to use document.body in .vimperatorrc, load .vimperatorrc no error
--
xxx = function() {
...
...document.body...
...
}
--
:js xxx()
display the error msg:
"TypeError: document.body has no properties"
:js aler
16 matches
Mail list logo
