0n Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:06:55AM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 00:23:06 AM +0200, Eyolf Østrem
>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> So, should I switch? I'm quite happy with bogo, especially with the
>> current setup with some macros I borrowed from an arti
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 00:23:06 AM +0200, Eyolf Østrem
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So, should I switch? I'm quite happy with bogo, especially with the
> current setup with some macros I borrowed from an article in linux
> journal (I think it was), but I would very much like to hear what
> your expe
Hi,
Thus wrote Eyolf Østrem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.10.05 06:54]:
> I've been using bogofilter ever since I first installed KDE/Kmail and the
> potentially hassle-free configuration of SpamAssassin led to constant
> crashes. I belive it has been solved by now, and in any case Kmail is
> ancient hi
On 2007.10.05 00:05:52 +, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday, October 4 at 09:52 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> >Can someone please point me toward some info on how I can utilize abook
> >from within Mutt. I would like to be able to both use the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 4 at 09:52 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
>Can someone please point me toward some info on how I can utilize abook
>from within Mutt. I would like to be able to both use the Abook
>entries, and add new addresses via Mutt.
http://wiki.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 4 at 10:41 PM, quoth Joseph:
>After recompiling mutt with: pop and mbox support when I try to start
>mutt I get:
>Reading /home/joseph/.maildir/inbox...Segmentation fault
>
>Does anybody knows what it is?
Not offhand, but if I ha
Can someone please point me toward some info on how I can utilize abook
from within Mutt. I would like to be able to both use the Abook
entries, and add new addresses via Mutt.
Rem
After recompiling mutt with: pop and mbox support when I try to start
mutt I get:
Reading /home/joseph/.maildir/inbox...Segmentation fault
Does anybody knows what it is?
--
#Joseph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 4 at 06:14 PM, quoth Joseph:
>I am trying to access mail on a remote pop server and it seems like a simple
>procedure:
>type: c
>pop://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>
>it should ask me for a password, instead it is giving me message: is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 12:23 AM, quoth Eyolf Østrem:
>So, should I switch? I'm quite happy with bogo
If you're satisfied with your current spam prevention technique,
there's absolutely no reason to switch. At best, you'll get fewer
spams. If the s
I am trying to access mail on a remote pop server and it seems like a simple
procedure:
type: c
pop://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
it should ask me for a password, instead it is giving me message: is not a
mailbox
I've tried issue command prior :set mbox_type=mbox
still the same message.
--
#Joseph
GPG
On 04.10.2007 (13:13), Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2007-10-04, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > $ cat external-reply
> > #!/bin/sh
> > DRAFT="$1"
> > # hard-link our own copy of the draft so that mutt can remove original
> > ln "$DRAFT" "$DRAFT.tmp"
>
> I don't think that will work.
I've been using bogofilter ever since I first installed KDE/Kmail and the
potentially hassle-free configuration of SpamAssassin led to constant
crashes. I belive it has been solved by now, and in any case Kmail is
ancient history, but I was wondering what experiences the list people
have with vario
On 2007.10.04 14:54:17 +, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday, October 4 at 11:31 AM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> > I had just finished modifying my .muttrc file to source my alias
> > folder, and now every time that I try to send an email I get a
On 2007-10-04, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something along these lines might work. Untested. It's been years
> since I used xterm, so I'm not sure if the syntax below is correct for
> expressing what xterm should run. Might need to add sh -c and quoting,
> or somesuch. Maybe yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 4 at 11:31 AM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> I had just finished modifying my .muttrc file to source my alias
> folder, and now every time that I try to send an email I get an
> error message stating: Aborted unmodified message.
That
[Thu, 04/10/07 at 22:48 +0545] Dilip M wrote:
> On 10/4/07, bt44 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know this is not specific to mutt per se, and more to do
> > with my MTA, but anyways I will ask it.
> >
> > I use mutt + fetchmail + procmail + ssmtp. No issues, works
> > great. But just one feature
> All I was able to find is a solution with "Ctrl-z" putting it in a
> background and starting new session. That is not really a solution.
Agreed. That's not it.
> I'm sure somebody has similar macro worked out, it is just a mutter of
> finding it :-/
Something along these lines might work.
Help! I have no idea what I did, but I am no longer able send mail via
Mutt. I had just finished modifying my .muttrc file to source my alias
folder, and now every time that I try to send an email I get an error
message stating: Aborted unmodified message. This happens whether or
not I try t
On 10/04/07 10:59, David Champion wrote:
> > It would be nice if it was possible to start a New Email or Replies in
> > a new shell session and close it automatically when a mail is sent,
> > without, going through postpone.
> >
> > Is it possible?
>
> Check the archives -- possibly a few years ba
On 10/4/07, bt44 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this is not specific to mutt per se, and more to do
> with my MTA, but anyways I will ask it.
>
> I use mutt + fetchmail + procmail + ssmtp. No issues, works
> great. But just one feature I want to get going. I would
> like to send my replies or
> As I understand, ssmtp does not support message queuing,
> which is possible in other mta's, but if there is any
> workaround to this (before I explore any other mta), would
> like to know it.
Check the archives, possible several years back. People have posted
scripts for this too. :)
Basical
I know this is not specific to mutt per se, and more to do
with my MTA, but anyways I will ask it.
I use mutt + fetchmail + procmail + ssmtp. No issues, works
great. But just one feature I want to get going. I would
like to send my replies or new messages later (all once,
but they should get qu
I keep my mail in two separate hierarchies, all incoming mail is
delivered (via a perl script which does procmail sort of things) to
a series of maildir mailboxes in ~/Mail and ~/Mail/lists.
All the mail that I save for any reason is saved in mbox format below
~/savedMail. I have "set mbox_type=m
> It would be nice if it was possible to start a New Email or Replies in
> a new shell session and close it automatically when a mail is sent,
> without, going through postpone.
>
> Is it possible?
Check the archives -- possibly a few years back. People have posted
examples of how to do this usin
> > It would be nice if it was possible to start a New Email or Replies in a
> > new shell session and close it
> > automatically when a mail is sent, without, going through postpone.
>
> I was missing that functionality too. I solved it the other way
> around: open a new instance of mutt.
Whe
On 03.10.2007 (21:57), Joseph wrote:
> It would be nice if it was possible to start a New Email or Replies in a new
> shell session and close it
> automatically when a mail is sent, without, going through postpone.
>
> Is it possible?
>
> Sometimes I have to look up/collect some information fro
27 matches
Mail list logo
