Re: Triple wrap

2007-09-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 11 at 03:44 PM, quoth Meenal Pant: > I have read that Outlook and Outlook Express support *reading* > triple wrap emails. > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa995740.aspx Other than > this I do not know any other emai

Re: Triple wrap

2007-09-11 Thread Meenal Pant
Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Monday, September 10 at 12:30 PM, quoth Meenal Pant: > > Does Mutt support Triple wrap ( sign,encrypt,sign)with smime or gpg ? > > If no, then what would be a way to achieve this? > > Mutt doesn't support this behavior. The way to get what you want would > probably to do a

Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Arvind Marathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-11-07 15:43]: > Some more info: > I found out that all my mails were sitting in the file /var/mail/arvind, > realised that exim had by default set > "Delivery method for local mail:" > to > "mbox format in /var/mail/". > I changed it to > "Maildir format in

Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Arvind Marathe
Some more info: I found out that all my mails were sitting in the file /var/mail/arvind, realised that exim had by default set "Delivery method for local mail:" to "mbox format in /var/mail/". I changed it to "Maildir format in home directory". Not sure if that was the cause of the problem but sti

Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Arvind Marathe
Following is my .procmailrc, if that is any help --- MAILDIR=$HOME/mail/ LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmaillog VERBOSE=no :0 inbox/ --- And this is my ~/.procmaillog --- >From [

Re: compose with mutt on a remote server

2007-09-11 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 11 at 07:59 PM, quoth mess-mate: >> - You have a mail server. It runs Courier. Correct? > >correct > >> - You have a desktop. You run mutt on the deskop. Mutt access >> the mails via IMAP. Correct? > >correct > >> - W

Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Breen Mullins
On 9/11/07, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think getmail marks messages as read once you receive them. In fact, > it may so have happened that of your 582 messages, only 417 were new > (unread), but getmail's claim to have delivered everything beats me. The OP's getmailrc calls pro

Re: compose with mutt on a remote server

2007-09-11 Thread mess-mate
Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:42:09PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: | | > Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:30:12PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: | > | | > | > Well..no. | > | > I've a remote machine were i keep all the email

Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Arvind, On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:54:33PM +0530, Arvind Marathe wrote: > Another problem: when i again open my account in webmail, all of the latest of > the 582 mails which were unread are shown as 'read' after i had tried to > receive > them in mutt. But as i said, i can't find them in my

Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Arvind Marathe
Another problem: when i again open my account in webmail, all of the latest of the 582 mails which were unread are shown as 'read' after i had tried to receive them in mutt. But as i said, i can't find them in my mutt inbox. Arvind > Hi all, > i am new to mutt and am trying to configure it for th

mutt configuration: problem with getting mail

2007-09-11 Thread Arvind Marathe
Hi all, i am new to mutt and am trying to configure it for the first time. I've tried setting up exim, getmail, procmail and mutt. When i send a mail, it reaches the destination alright, but i have problem receiving mails on my machine. Right now, there are 582 messages in my INBOX. When i try to

Re: compose with mutt on a remote server

2007-09-11 Thread Kai Grossjohann
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:42:09PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: > Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:30:12PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: > | > | > Well..no. > | > I've a remote machine were i keep all the email's for all the users > | > (virtual). > | > From my deskt