Xdefaults (was: Subject ü î)

2007-09-10 Thread Christian Ebert
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, September 10, 2007 at 19:38:21 -0400 > Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/10/07 @ 18.25.23 -0500]: >> And of course, you can try them out, and if you don't like the >> results, change it back to how it is now without a second thought. :) > > As a matter of fact, I don't se

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread Eyolf Østrem
On 10.09.2007 (19:38), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/10/07 @ 18.25.23 -0500]: > > And of course, you can try them out, and if you don't like the > > results, change it back to how it is now without a second thought. :) > > As a matter of fact, I don't seem to have .Xdefau

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-09-10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/10/07 @ 18.25.23 -0500]: > > And of course, you can try them out, and if you don't like the > > results, change it back to how it is now without a second thought. :) > > I don't know what it is now, since I do not have an ~/.Xd

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread dv1445
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/10/07 @ 18.25.23 -0500]: > And of course, you can try them out, and if you don't like the > results, change it back to how it is now without a second thought. :) As a matter of fact, I don't seem to have .Xdefaults *anywhere* on my machine. There is something called

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread dv1445
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/10/07 @ 18.25.23 -0500]: > And of course, you can try them out, and if you don't like the > results, change it back to how it is now without a second thought. :) I don't know what it is now, since I do not have an ~/.Xdefaults file. (not in my home dir anyway). Can

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, September 10 at 05:38 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Thanks for the link and info. I may play around with it, but I'm > hesitant, because xterm's colors are just fine *unless* I either (1) > call uxterm, or (2) call the factory xterm from

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread Eyolf Østrem
On 10.09.2007 (17:38), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for the link and info. I may play around with it, but I'm hesitant, > because xterm's colors are just fine *unless* I either (1) call uxterm, or > (2) call the factory xterm from Apple as opposed to the one I built myself. > If I tweak c

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread dv1445
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/10/07 @ 15.13.49 -0500]: > On Monday, September 10 at 03:42 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > I've tried setting it to xterm-16color, 256color, and just color, > > all with no dice. The messed-up colors have a precedent. When I > > installed OSX 10.4 with Apple's X11,

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, September 10 at 03:42 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I've tried setting it to xterm-16color, 256color, and just color, > all with no dice. The messed-up colors have a precedent. When I > installed OSX 10.4 with Apple's X11, the colors we

Re: Triple wrap

2007-09-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, September 10 at 12:30 PM, quoth Meenal Pant: >Does Mutt support Triple wrap ( sign,encrypt,sign)with smime or gpg ? >If no, then what would be a way to achieve this? I would point out that, as Don Davis suggests: Overall, it's clear

Re: Triple wrap

2007-09-10 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, September 10 at 12:30 PM, quoth Meenal Pant: >Does Mutt support Triple wrap ( sign,encrypt,sign)with smime or gpg ? >If no, then what would be a way to achieve this? Mutt doesn't support this behavior. The way to get what you want would p

Re: Subject üî

2007-09-10 Thread dv1445
Thus spake Kyle Wheeler [09/07/07 @ 08.01.34 -0500]: > >Latin1 it is, until further bizarre things pop up. Plus, xterm under > >X11 does it right under Latin1, while it is screwy under UTF-8. > >(uxterm and other things, like the -u8 option and friends, resulted > >in messed-up colors, includin

Triple wrap

2007-09-10 Thread Meenal Pant
Does Mutt support Triple wrap ( sign,encrypt,sign)with smime or gpg ? If no, then what would be a way to achieve this? Thanks, Meenal

Re: compose with mutt on a remote server

2007-09-10 Thread mess-mate
Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:30:12PM +0200, mess-mate wrote: | | > Well..no. | > I've a remote machine were i keep all the email's for all the users | > (virtual). | > From my desktop i connect with courier-imap to the remote server and | > access my mail