On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> Michelle,
>
> I think there is a misunderstanding. I wanted to understand how other
> people process their email. You are giving me pointers to programs but
> don't describe how you use them.
This is an interesting and universal
On 2007-07-20, Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Want to have an overview of messages that still need action of some
> > > type.
> >
> > ???
>
> I get a message. It could be something I read and then delete. Or it
> could be something that I read and then archive. Or I
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:05:23PM +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:19:42PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
>
> > The above strategy is a pretty good description of what I actually do.
>
> I wish I was that organized. It's difficult for me to muster the
> self-discipline to actua
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:19:42PM +0100, Chris G wrote:
> The above strategy is a pretty good description of what I actually do.
I wish I was that organized. It's difficult for me to muster the
self-discipline to actually do this.
> The only difference in my case is that I use a procmail looka
> When I write with mutt (1.4.2.2i) a mail without Subject: it asks
> me if I want to cancel this or not, and the default is to cancel it
> and not let it pass accidently by just hitting ENTER;
> so far so good;
>
> is it even somehow configurable that it does not let send me the
> mail without Su
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> Michelle,
>
> I think there is a misunderstanding. I wanted to understand how other
> people process their email. You are giving me pointers to programs but
> don't describe how you use them.
>
> Here is a potential strategy for
Matthias Apitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I write with mutt (1.4.2.2i) a mail without Subject: it asks
> me if I want to cancel this or not, and the default is to cancel it
> and not let it pass accidently by just hitting ENTER;
> so far so good;
>
> is it even somehow configurable that
Hello,
When I write with mutt (1.4.2.2i) a mail without Subject: it asks
me if I want to cancel this or not, and the default is to cancel it
and not let it pass accidently by just hitting ENTER;
so far so good;
is it even somehow configurable that it does not let send me the
mail without Subject
Michelle,
I think there is a misunderstanding. I wanted to understand how other
people process their email. You are giving me pointers to programs but
don't describe how you use them.
Here is a potential strategy for handling mail:
- All incoming mail goes to inbox.
- I process all mails f
