Hi Hein!
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Hein Zelle wrote:
> this has probably been mentioned before, but I'll toss it up anyway.
> What's the general opinion about storing mutt settings in a
> centralized place, e.g. on an imap server? I find that, using mutt from
> 3 different places accessing the same i
=- Stefan Maerkl wrote on Tue 19.Jun'07 at 11:37:16 +0200 -=
> Of course you would need some sort of "bootstrap config" to tell
> mutt where it should look for its configuration. But you would
> always need some basic configuration, because e.g. one would use
> different "From:" addresses dependin
=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon 18.Jun'07 at 14:42:23 + -=
> When I send a reply in mutt, the From: address is set to my
> userid, which is not valid for mail purposes. How can I
> permanently set the From: address to the ISP email address which
> is where I get my email from?
See the wiki
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-18 23:15 -0600]:
On Monday, June 18 at 08:38 PM, quoth Breen Mullins:
Chances are, you have it set to yes somewhere, like the /etc/Muttrc.
It's important to realize that pgp_verify_sig is a synonym for
crypt_verify_sig.
Yeah, I had pgp_verify_sig s
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:30:31PM +0100, Luciano Rocha wrote:
Thanks for the info. with mutt on my system, attempts to send mail via smtp
fail with mutt not even being able to complete a connection attempt. (I have
to kill the shell running mutt to abort the hung connection attempt).
Currently
tannhauser wrote:
> the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have
> the gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one
> key.
> so, how do i send emails to the mailinglist address and encrypt it
> with the various recipients' keys?
> i was very surprised that i
* tannhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-19 14:35 +0200]:
> the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have the
> gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one key.
I'm not sure, but I think there was a patch to use multiple keyids
with a crypt-hook (or pgp-ho
> As an irritating workaround, you can create a "mailing list" gpg key
> that everyone on the list has the secret key for.
If you already throw away the security which is introduced by public key
method, why then use GPG? ;-) I think it would be easiest to use "To:", "Cc:"
and "Reply to all" to r
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 12:50:54PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone got smtp email in mutt actually working?
Yes, it's working fine, except for an smtp server without the private
key and mutt doesn't recover from the START_TLS failure (and I haven't
found a way to disable tls yet).
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, June 19 at 02:35 PM, quoth tannhauser:
> the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have
> the gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one
> key. so, how do i send emails to the mailinglist address an
Hi Dave,
> Has anyone got smtp email in mutt actually working?
Me.
> If yes, could that person post the configure settings used to
> compile mutt, and also the contents of the .muttrc file so
> I can compare that info with my mutt settings which still do not
> allow smtp to work?
I only have o
Has anyone got smtp email in mutt actually working?
If yes, could that person post the configure settings used to
compile mutt, and also the contents of the .muttrc file so
I can compare that info with my mutt settings which still do not
allow smtp to work?
Thanks.
Dave Feustel
--
Don't Worry.
> at the moment, i face this problem only with this mailing list. i'm not
> sure if it's impossible in general to encrypt emails with more than one
> key (for example: one email, two recipients in to:, both recipients'
> keys in the keyring), i have to test that.
Encryption with more than one key
* tannhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19-06-2007 14:36]:
> the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have the
> gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one key.
> so, how do i send emails to the mailinglist address and encrypt it with
> the various recipients' k
hello,
the concrete problem: i'm on a (very small) mailinglist. we all have the
gpg keys of the others. i can not encrypt with more than one key.
so, how do i send emails to the mailinglist address and encrypt it with
the various recipients' keys?
i was very surprised that i was not able to choos
[store mutt config on IMAP server]
1) .muttrc is a text file
2) E-Mails are some sort of text files
...so you would just need a command "read config from mail".
Of course you would need some sort of "bootstrap config" to tell mutt
where it should look for its configuration. But you would always
Hello list,
this has probably been mentioned before, but I'll toss it up anyway.
What's the general opinion about storing mutt settings in a
centralized place, e.g. on an imap server? I find that, using mutt from
3 different places accessing the same imap server, it gets tedious to
synchronize se
17 matches
Mail list logo
