On 31/03/07, David Haguenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-03-31 21:05:08 Sat:
> This may sound like a phenomenally idiotic question, but I'd
> like to somehow send an email to a friend with a broken
> signature to make it look as if the message has been modi
* mal content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-03-31 21:05:08 Sat:
> This may sound like a phenomenally idiotic question, but I'd
> like to somehow send an email to a friend with a broken
> signature to make it look as if the message has been modified
> in transit.
One way to achieve this would be to sen
Hello.
This may sound like a phenomenally idiotic question, but I'd
like to somehow send an email to a friend with a broken
signature to make it look as if the message has been modified
in transit. I'm teaching him the ins and outs of PGP and he'd
like to see what it's like when a signature is in
=- Greg Novack wrote on Fri 30.Mar'07 at 16:32:02 -0500 -=
> > > Come to think of it, this has spawned another question. When I
> > > use '<' instead of '-i', I am not even prompted for a password,
> > > which I assume is because mutt doesn't need me to interact with
> > > msmtp. But when I use '-
