* "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 01:58]:
> Can I see a filtering example from your .procmailrc? Say, to filter this
> mailing list?
No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
#cat .qmail-mutt
~/Maildir/.mutt/
That's a lot better that filtering
- On Tue, 10.Sep.2002, 19:58EDT, Michael P. Soulier uttered:
> On 11/09/02 Johan Almqvist did speaketh:
>
> > # cat ~/.qmail
> > |preline procmail -t ~/.procmailrc
> >
> > # cat ~/.procmailrc
> > DEFAULT="~/Maildir/"
> >
> > #cat ~/.muttrc
> > mailboxes ~/Maildir/
>
> I take it that your
- On Tue, 10.Sep.2002, 22:00EDT, Keith R. John Warno uttered:
> (Every dir below ~/Mail is assumed to be in maildir format; this picks
> up things like sent-mail and postponed and other fcc locations, so mutt
> winds up claiming things like 'new mail in =sent-mail' after sending a
> mail out,
* Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11 Sep 2002 09:58]:
> On 11/09/02 Johan Almqvist did speaketh:
[...]
> Can I see a filtering example from your .procmailrc? Say, to filter
> this mailing list?
:0:
* ^Sender: owner-mutt-(dev|users)@mutt.org
apps-mutt/
Basically, it's just like an mbox
On 11/09/02 Johan Almqvist did speaketh:
> # cat ~/.qmail
> |preline procmail -t ~/.procmailrc
>
> # cat ~/.procmailrc
> DEFAULT="~/Maildir/"
>
> #cat ~/.muttrc
> mailboxes ~/Maildir/
I take it that your other mail folders then would be sub-folders of
~/Maildir? My sysadmin recently told m
* "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 01:13]:
> I just starting using qmail with Maildir format. I'm a long-time Mutt,
> Procmail and mbox user. Does anyone have an example .procmailrc file, and
> .muttrc file, for working with Maildir format?
# cat ~/.qmail
|preline procmail -t
Hey people,
I just starting using qmail with Maildir format. I'm a long-time Mutt,
Procmail and mbox user. Does anyone have an example .procmailrc file, and
.muttrc file, for working with Maildir format?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC
- On Tue, 10.Sep.2002, 15:05EDT, Gary Johnson uttered:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:58:54PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> > set index_format="%4C%Z%[%b %d] %-15.15L (%4l)%s"
>
> To see the local time as well as the date
- On Tue, 10.Sep.2002, 13:58EDT, Mark J. Reed uttered:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> > Simply replace %d with %D in the value of the $index_format
> Whups, I lied. I mean, that would be correct if you were using
> %d *outside* of %{...}, but stuff inside %{..
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:58:54PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> set index_format="%4C%Z%[%b %d] %-15.15L (%4l)%s"
To see the local time as well as the date in the pager, you might also
want to set 'pager_format'. This is wh
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Simply replace %d with %D in the value of the $index_format
Whups, I lied. I mean, that would be correct if you were using
%d *outside* of %{...}, but stuff inside %{...} is strftime(3) format
characters, not mutt format characters.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:09:05PM -0400, Keith R. John Warno wrote:
> Is there any intuitive way to get the ``Date:'' header (as shown in the
> pager) to always show the time converted to my local time zone?
Well, I don't know how intutive it is, but there is an easy way to do it.
Simply replace
Greets.
Is there any intuitive way to get the ``Date:'' header (as shown in the
pager) to always show the time converted to my local time zone, or GMT,
or any given time zone so long as it's consistent across all messages?
Thanks,
Keith
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:42:21AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> Brian Grayson wrote:
> > I downloaded 1.4 on Friday just to see, and the same problem
> > occurs. The fundamental problem is once the CTE code sees a
> > nonzero value of lobin, it goes into quoted, regardless of
> > whether hibi
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:08:44PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Pedro Alves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > I want to make a compose macro that verifies the from-address and changes
> > the fcc according to that value...
> >
> > perhaps something like:
> >
> > compose V if ( == 'foo@ba
Pedro Alves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I want to make a compose macro that verifies the from-address and changes
> the fcc according to that value...
>
> perhaps something like:
>
> compose V if ( == 'foo@bar' )then { = '=bla'}
>
> Can you give me a hand on this?
What about fcc-h
Hi!
I want to make a compose macro that verifies the from-address and changes
the fcc according to that value...
perhaps something like:
compose V if ( == 'foo@bar' )then { = '=bla'}
Can you give me a hand on this?
Thanks a lot
--
Pedro Miguel G. Alves [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello, I found what seems to be a bug.
Well, it IS a bug. Don't know if it is mutt's or LookOut's.
I received a message from someone using outlook containing an email
attached (*.eml). Unfortunately, outlook sends the attachment as
"application/octet-stream", so mutt can't really recognize it
aut
Hi Keith
What you could do instead of recording mail via the record variable
is use fcc-hook. I do it to record my email in various places based
on the addresses I send to. e.g. for mutt-users I have
fcc-hook "~L mutt-users" "=archive-mutt-users"
This way, the message is not tagged as new in th
* Keith Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 08:40]:
> Every time I send an email, my sent-mail box gets tagged with a
> new-mail N. This is good for *all* of my other mail directorys, but
> not not for sent-mail.
Do you have send-mail in $mailboxes?
(darren)
--
Maybe that's the only trut
Hi,
Every time I send an email, my sent-mail box gets tagged with a new-mail N. This is
good for *all* of my other mail directorys, but not not for sent-mail.
I've tried various things in my .muttrc but to no avail. Is there any way of getting
it so that this does not happen?
Any help on th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:01:33AM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> It sounds like Gary Johnson's suggestion above (calling
> Mozilla from w3m) could do the trick, though I guess what
> I'd really like to do is hand the message off immediately to,
> say, the mailer in Netscape or Mozilla.
or lynx - d
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:45:27PM -0700, JeeBak Kim wrote:
> * Thomas Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020909 23:03]:
> > I have used various workarounds -- at one extreme, switch to
> > Mozilla and re-type the URL -- but this is really inefficient
> > if the task is to click my way through, say, a blo
23 matches
Mail list logo
