Re: Mutt guessing wrong encoding for outgoing PDFs?

Brian Grayson wrote: > Hm. I have 1.2.5 source locally, and it looks like in > mutt_set_encoding() in sendlib.c, the following logic may be > faulty: I just noticed that you are using an extremely ancient version of Mutt (0.95). Please try using Mutt 1.4, which is the current stable version.

Re: top-post supports bad software (was: location of signature.)

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 13:54 +0200]: > * Paul Brannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 09:03]: > > What part of the header should I be filtering on? > > using "TO" is fine. In my experience, it's best to find a header set by the list processing software and filter on that h

mixmaster

More out of curiosity than anything, does anyone know the status of mixmaster and it's ability to work within mutt? I've been using mutt on a Red Hat box, and just recently switched over to Debian. The default apt-get for mutt had mixmaster as a choice up with the headers, so I started trying t

Re: location of signature.

At 1:37 AM EDT on September 6 Paul Brannan sent off: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I disagree. While bottom posting is appropriate for most public forums > (because discussions on these forums generally involve a point-by-point > debate), there is a vali

Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists

On Sat, 07 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Oliver Fuchs told: [...] > Absolutely ... who wrote this? > > Banned from the list. > No, banned from the pubs. Skoal! Elimar -- Planung: Ersatz des Zufalls durch den Irrtum. -unknown- msg30787/pgp0.pgp Des

Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists

On Sat, 07 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Oliver Fuchs told: > > > On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > or this: > > > > > > :0: > > > * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net) > > > mutt > > > > > >

Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Oliver Fuchs told: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > [...] > > > > or this: > > > > :0: > > * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net) > > mutt > > > > Sven > but also this in .muttrc: > > set followup_to=yes

Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 20:09]: > > Try this: > > > > :0: > > * ^TO_mutt-users@mutt\.org > > mutt > > > > :0: > > * ^TO_mutt-users@gbnet\.net > > mutt > > > > :0: > > * ^TO_mutt-announce@mutt\.org > > mutt > > or this: > > :0: >

Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists

* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 20:09]: > Try this: > > :0: > * ^TO_mutt-users@mutt\.org > mutt > > :0: > * ^TO_mutt-users@gbnet\.net > mutt > > :0: > * ^TO_mutt-announce@mutt\.org > mutt or this: :0: * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users)@(mutt\.org|gbnet\.net) mutt Sven

Re: location of signature.

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002, Paul Brannan wrote: > folder? My procmailrc searches for "^TO.*mutt-users", but mutt-users > doesn't seem to be anywhere in the headers (unless I missed it somehow). Try this: :0: * ^TO_mutt-users@mutt\.org mutt :0: * ^TO_mutt-users@gbnet\.net mutt :0: * ^TO_mutt-announc

colors and replying

1. With mutt 1.4, I get white letters and black background. I had to set COLORFGBG=default;default for the behaviour of mutt 1.2. Only 8 colors are supported by mutt. Using only those 8 colors hardly enhances legibility, are there any plans to enhance this functionality? 2. Why not include only

Re: Mutt guessing wrong encoding for outgoing PDFs?

Hm. I have 1.2.5 source locally, and it looks like in mutt_set_encoding() in sendlib.c, the following logic may be faulty: static void mutt_set_encoding (BODY *b, CONTENT *info) { if (b->type == TYPETEXT) { if (info->lobin || info->linemax > 990 || (info->from && opt

Re: rtfm dammit

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:30:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Someday Sven will realize that mutt is a tool, not a religion. (maybe.. ) > (Now "where" did I put my flameproof suit / ) Oh, I doubt it. We'll probably have self-appointed net cops with us as long as there's a net. Just wat

Re: rtfm dammit

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:03:00PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 11:52]: > > List reply ? there's a LIST REPLY ? Time for more RTM ! > > argh! hee hee, you are SO easy to tweak! :) > > > (I'm afraid Elm is still programmed into my fingers, ju

Re: A question on forwarding

On 09/05/02 18:41 -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > To forward messages that way, you need to go to the attachment menu > ('v'), tag all the attachments ('t'), then forward them all using ';f'. Doesn't esc e simply do what is wanted? I tried it with an excel spreadsheet and it seems to work just f

Re: Mutt guessing wrong encoding for outgoing PDFs?

I'm attaching three files: rep1k (quoted -- this is what came up). This is the first 1K of the PDF that misbehaved, and it decided wrong. rep.5k (8bit -- this is what came up, so it guessed right). This is only the first 512 bytes of the PDF. rep1k, forced to use base64 encoding, so th

Re: A question on forwarding

On 020906, at 02:11:08, Gary Johnson wrote > [...] However, if I forward a > message with the same body but with an application/excel attachment, > mutt includes both parts in the body of the forwarding message since my > mailcap has a rule for converting Excel attachments to text and my > muttrc

gbnet.net [was Re: After-editing hook?]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:28:27AM -0700, David T-G wrote: > Jeff -- > > BTW, you should use the @mutt.org address for the mutt-users list rather > than the @gbnet address. Yes, the gbnet address leaks out now and again > (I don't really know how, but think it might be digest-related), but > we'

Re: Ctrl-L after finding signed mail

* Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-09-2002 16:56]: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:21:58AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > > Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > Mutt Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > are you not susbcribed to the list? (see sig) > > > > Yes

Re: ACS and Slang

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Thomas E. Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > my impression (haven't seen any comments that this is fixed yet) is that > > the slang UTF-8 package doesn't work for line-drawing characters. There > > were some patches to hardcode the corresponding UTF

Re: Ctrl-L after finding signed mail

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:21:58AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > um, how exactly do you "go through" a signed message? > do you view the message with display-message? Yes. > do you have pgp_verify_sig set? Yes. The screen goes "offbalance" when gpg is invoked and returns something like: not a

Re: ACS and Slang

Thomas E. Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > my impression (haven't seen any comments that this is fixed yet) is that > the slang UTF-8 package doesn't work for line-drawing characters. There > were some patches to hardcode the corresponding UTF-8 strings which may > make it usable. Yeah, the t

Re: ACS and Slang

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told: > > I haven't made one. Perhaps it's about time. This topic comes up > > occasionally, and since I'm in the process of checking the pre-release, > > it's a good idea to work on thi

Re: Can't open PGP subprocess!

* Frederick Grim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 09:19]: > I am using mutt to acess an IMAP mailbox on a remote machine through a > ssh tunnel. However every time I try to sign my mail I get >Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2) > I am not sure why this is happeni

screen shots with "screen" or "gimp" (was: A couple of questions)

* Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 12:06]: > >% I have a couple of questions about a couple of things. > >You listed more than a couple. Can we charge you extra? I'm only > >going to answer a couple until you pay the extra baggage fee ;-) > > To whom do I make out the check? :-) s

Re: display_filter + sed - tabs to quotes (was: A couple of questions)

* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-05 20:47]: > * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-05 15:37]: > > Look at display_filter, section 6.3.36 in the manual > > (). > > Set it to a script that does something like: > >

Re: ACS and Slang

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told: > > > otoh, ncursesw does support Unicode/UTF-8 line-drawing... > > > > > > perhaps it would be simpler to j

do NOT attach screen shots to this list! (was: A couple of questions)

* David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06]: > Can you verify that a test message that meets these requirements .. > Once you have such a message in hand, please gzip it and forward it > to the list along with screen clips ... argh! NO! do *not* attach screen clips to your messag

rtfm dammit (was: location of signature.)

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 11:52]: > > I also notice that neither list-reply nor group-reply works > > with the post I am responding to; I had to paste mutt-users > > into the Cc: line to reply to the list. Any ideas why? > > List reply ? there's a LIST REPLY ? Time fo

Re: A couple of questions

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 07:46:28AM -0400, David T-G wrote: >Michael -- > >...and then Michael Herman said... >% >% I have a couple of questions about a couple of things. > >You listed more than a couple. Can we charge you extra? :-) I'm only >going to answer a couple until you pay the extra bag

top-post supports bad software (was: location of signature.)

* Paul Brannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 09:03]: > if someone sends you a long email (and it is necessary > and/or appropriate to quote the email or a large portion > of it), then replying at the top saves the reader the > time of scrolling to the bottom to find the reply. so you top-post b

Re: A couple of questions

Michael -- ...and then Michael Herman said... % % I have a couple of questions about a couple of things. You listed more than a couple. Can we charge you extra? :-) I'm only going to answer a couple until you pay the extra baggage fee ;-) % ... % 2. When I receive an e-mail from someone a

Re: location of signature.

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:20AM -0400, Paul Brannan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Top posting sends the message "I am so much more important than all > > several hundred of you others on this list that I don't care how much of > > your time I wa

Re: ACS and Slang

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told: > > otoh, ncursesw does support Unicode/UTF-8 line-drawing... > > > > perhaps it would be simpler to just patch mutt to add the extra places to > > fill in the background. > [...] >

Re: mutt and exchange

Greg -- ...and then Gregory Seidman said... % ... % When I run mutt -f imap://server/ it asks for my username and password, % then tells me that the login failed. The username and password are right, I've seen this once or twice, and not even with an Exchange server (ick). My problem was that I

Re: location of signature.

Paul, et al -- ...and then Paul Brannan said... % % On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % > Top posting sends the message "I am so much more important than all ... % > Bottom posting says "I respect the others on this list and I will take a ... % % I disagree. Wh

Re: location of signature.

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:10:31AM +0100, Sam Bashton wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:20AM -0400, Paul Brannan wrote: > > BTW, why did this post show up in my inbox rather than in my mutt > > folder? My procmailrc searches for "^TO.*mutt-users", but mutt-users > > doesn't seem to be anywhe

Re: After-editing hook?

Jeff -- BTW, you should use the @mutt.org address for the mutt-users list rather than the @gbnet address. Yes, the gbnet address leaks out now and again (I don't really know how, but think it might be digest-related), but we're trying to get it squashed once and for all. ...and then Jeff Turner

Re: ACS and Slang

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas E. Dickey told: > On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was > > to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view > > the pager with

Re: ACS and Slang

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Hi all, > > I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was > to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view > the pager with ACS trees. I have to switch to "set ascii_chars" in > muttrc. my impression (hav

ACS and Slang

Hi all, I compiled unpatched sources from mutt.org against slang. This was to have a full background colored headerline! But now I can not view the pager with ACS trees. I have to switch to "set ascii_chars" in muttrc. The version of slang I am using is: ii slang1 1.4.5-1 ii slang1-

Re: mutt colors

On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told: > On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told: > > > Hi all, > > > > one of my colorsets is > > > > color hdrdefault blackcyan > > I compiled the unpatched source from mutt.org against slang >

Re: mutt colors

On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Elimar Riesebieter told: > Hi all, > > one of my colorsets is > > color hdrdefault blackcyan I compiled the unpatched source from mutt.org against slang (--with-slang) and now it works. There is only one thing to solve: Can't use ACF now, asc

Re: After-editing hook?

Jeff Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I'd like to write a hook that triggers after I've typed an email, matches > on '~b attached.is.', and runs a script which prompts is big letters, > "Are you SURE you've attached it?". Sorry can't help you with that. > Another scenario for such a hook i

Re: A question on forwarding

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:25:40PM -0700, David Ellement wrote: > On 020905, at 18:41:18, Gary Johnson wrote > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:57:24PM -0400, Michael Herman wrote: > > > Is there a way to forward e-mails in-line but any attachments are > > > attached to the forward? > > > > > > For

Re: location of signature.

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:37:20AM -0400, Paul Brannan wrote: > BTW, why did this post show up in my inbox rather than in my mutt > folder? My procmailrc searches for "^TO.*mutt-users", but mutt-users > doesn't seem to be anywhere in the headers (unless I missed it somehow). > What part of the he

Can't open PGP subprocess!

Howdy all, I am using mutt to acess an IMAP mailbox on a remote machine through a ssh tunnel. However every time I try to sign my mail I get Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2) I am not sure why this is happening. Both the server and the client have gpg. I can s

After-editing hook?

Hi, I'd like to write a hook that triggers after I've typed an email, matches on '~b attached.is.', and runs a script which prompts is big letters, "Are you SURE you've attached it?". What's preventing me from implementing this quantum leap in mailer technology is the seeming lack of a hook to d

Re: location of signature.

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 07:49:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Top posting sends the message "I am so much more important than all > several hundred of you others on this list that I don't care how much of > your time I waste." > > Bottom posting says "I respect the others on this list and