Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> The development branch now has a reply-hook.
Neat. :)
Michael
--
"...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly)."
(By Matt Welsh)
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
At 21:05 -0700 04 Sep 2002, David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed this in the headers to your message as received on my end:
>
> X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable
> by inet34.rd.bbc.co.uk
> So it seems your machine won't allow 8bit out,
It's more like
On 020904, at 23:51:01, Andre Berger wrote
> * Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-04 23:06 -0400:
> > 5. Is there a way to force Mutt to reload the .muttrc without quiting
> > and launching?
>
> :source ~/.muttrc
I find it helpful to include the lines:
reset all
unhook *
I noticed this in the headers to your message as received on my end:
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable
by inet34.rd.bbc.co.uk
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit
by hpsdlfsa.sdd.hp.com
So it seems your machine won't allow 8bit out, while
Michael Herman wrote:
> 1. I have a custom attribution string for responding to e-mails that
> I send to people at work. The attribution use ~t to show to whom
> the previous, quoted e-mail was addressed. However, if the e-mail
> is addressed to more then one person, only the first
On 020904, at 17:57:25, Jonathan Perkin wrote
> Basically, I want mail sent with foreign chars such as £ å é etc
> to *not* be sent as QP or base64.
>
> Unfortunately, no matter how I configure mutt, I cannot seem to
> get it to behave:
>
> unset allow_8bit, unset use_8bitmime:
> Content-T
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
* Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-04 23:06 -0400:
> 5. Is there a way to force Mutt to reload the .muttrc without quiting
> and launching?
:source ~/.muttrc
-Andre
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Con
* David Rock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 04, 02 at 18:05:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:27:19PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> > Michael Leone sez:
Just to be clear .. I did *not* say the following.
> >
> > Well, I guessed a couple of workgroups, which didn't work, but I don't know
>
I have a couple of questions about a couple of things.
1. I have a custom attribution string for responding to e-mails that
I send to people at work. The attribution use ~t to show to whom
the previous, quoted e-mail was addressed. However, if the e-mail
is addressed to more then o
'set sig_on_top' is all I need. Just as Mutt user's manual says: 'It is
strongly recommended that you do not set this variable unless you really
know what you are doing, and are prepared to take some heat from
netiquette guardians.', I was taught some lessons by the guardians. :-)
Thank you.
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
>>> I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this
>>> has nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important
>>> part (my reply) before non-important part (quote)
>> I understand your line of reasoning, but I think most people (if they
>> haven't b
* Bo Peng ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 Sep 2002 11:40]:
[...]
> I do not see anything wrong with quoting the whole message. It is a
> good reference if the reader need to read it or it can be ignored
> easily.
But I already have the previous messages. I can press P and read them. A
much better refere
The discussion has gone closely to personal attack. I might have
triggered some anti-M$ feelings. :-(
> > I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has
> > nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my
> > reply) before non-important part (quote)
Hi Gregory!
i also had the prob with my mutt.
without putting my password into my muttrc - i think its much saver on
most computers but mine at home - i found something strange out.
when i "backspaced" on the password-question and tham typed my
password it worked.
so there was some prob with th
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-04-02 18:22]:
>
> It is natural (to me) to put important part (my reply) before non-important
> part (quote)
If the quote isn't important, leave it out altogether. Notice how I didn't
quote all of the text of the original message? Notice how much easier to rea
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-04-02 18:22]:
>
> OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules.
> I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has
> nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my
> reply) before non-importan
At 7:17 PM EDT on September 4 Bo Peng sent off:
> I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has
> nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my
> reply) before non-important part (quote)
I understand your line of reasoning, but I think most peop
OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules.
I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has
nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my
reply) before non-important part (quote) and keep my signature closer to
the main bo
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:27:19PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Michael Leone sez:
>
> Well, I guessed a couple of workgroups, which didn't work, but I don't know
> what workgroup I am in. Is there any way to tell from Windows XP
> Professional (which is where I have Outlook working)? I don't
Hi folks!
I'm using a compresed folder for this list as a local archive...
it has about 1.200 selected mails (hint about list content
quality), and some weeks ago I started having a problem that
annoys me a lot.
My procmail moves the list new mails into
mail/m.lists/inet-tech/mutt-users and I mo
Michael Leone sez:
}
} Elimar Riesebieter said:
}
} > No! The admin has to enable imap. Does he knows how to?
}
} I believe that IMAP is enabled by default on Exchange (it was on mine, I
} believe). So if it's not running, the admin must have turned it off.
I have determined that IMAP is enabl
Gregory Seidman said:
>
> When I run mutt -f imap://server/ it asks for my username and password,
> then tells me that the login failed. The username and password are
> right, since I use them successfully with Outlook. Much the same thing
> happens with Mozilla mail, incidentally. Is there any w
Elimar Riesebieter said:
> No! The admin has to enable imap. Does he knows how to?
I believe that IMAP is enabled by default on Exchange (it was on mine, I
believe). So if it's not running, the admin must have turned it off.
--
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCD
Quoting Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Sep 04 15:21:
>
> Unfortunately, the job I now have uses MS Exchange for email and I
> can't seem to get mutt talking to it.
At my previous job it took me a while to get fetchmail working with
Exchange. It has been a while, but I seem to rememb
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Gregory Seidman told:
> I looked around for information on how to do this, but didn't find any. I
> would like to be able to deal with my email using mutt, as I have for a
> year or two. Unfortunately, the job I now have uses MS Exchange for email
> and
I looked around for information on how to do this, but didn't find any. I
would like to be able to deal with my email using mutt, as I have for a
year or two. Unfortunately, the job I now have uses MS Exchange for email
and I can't seem to get mutt talking to it.
When I run mutt -f imap://server/
Bo Peng wrote:
> I am sorry but I could not find this message. Could you tell me its
> subject or date? Is it in mutt-user group?
>
> > This discussion (Message-ID 8gcg1a$qte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]) may
> > be helpful for you.
It's a message ID. Go search Google Groups for it; you'll get a 12
messag
I am sorry but I could not find this message. Could you tell me its
subject or date? Is it in mutt-user group?
Thanks.
Bo
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:16:12PM +0200, Heiko Heil wrote:
> * Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/04/2002 18:01]:
> > Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the ema
Hi
I am using mutt to read the mails from imap server.
by mutt -f{imap server}. but when i try to send the
mails outside the lan its not working(bouncing back).
whereas inside mails are reaching inside the lan. I am
behind the proxy.
mail server and proxy are running on same
machines.there are s
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/04/2002 18:01]:
> Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let
> it be put before the quoted text?
This discussion (Message-ID 8gcg1a$qte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]) may
be helpful for you.
--
Best regards
Heiko
Hello,
This has been bugging me all afternoon, so it's time I let people
who know what they're doing tell me what I'm doing wrong :)
Basically, I want mail sent with foreign chars such as £ å é etc
to *not* be sent as QP or base64. Now, with
% /usr/sbin/sendmail -t
From: me
To: you
Subject: bl
# Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / 2002-09-04 10:24:57 + (-0500):
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let
> it be put before the quoted text?
yes. use Outlook.
--
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
5:32PM up 14 days, 23:25, 8 users, load averages: 0.02
Hi, Everyone,
Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let
it be put before the quoted text?
Thanks.
--
Bo Peng
Department of Statistics
Rice University
http://www.stat.rice.edu/~bpeng
Office: DH2076, (713) 348-2863
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:08:45PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas Dickey told:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > one of my colorsets is
> > >
> > > color hdrdefault black
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas Dickey told:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > one of my colorsets is
> >
> > color hdrdefault blackcyan
> >
> > The text, but _only_ the text of my headers is black on cyan. Is i
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> one of my colorsets is
>
> color hdrdefault blackcyan
>
> The text, but _only_ the text of my headers is black on cyan. Is it
> possible to get the whole lines backgrounded in cyan? Tested in
> xterm, ater
Hi all,
one of my colorsets is
color hdrdefault blackcyan
The text, but _only_ the text of my headers is black on cyan. Is it
possible to get the whole lines backgrounded in cyan? Tested in
xterm, aterm and ttyx.
Thx in advance
Ciao
Elimar
--
The way to source is always uphill!
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 17:12 (12:38:00)]
> i fail to see how knowing the version of mutt you are running will
> give any attacker enough information to hack your box.
Hints... take a carefull peek at the mail headers... than you
get noy only the MUA, but the first M
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2002 (11:38) :
> Is there a way so I can set up a default hook which will be used for
> all folders that do not have a special folder-hook? If not I have to
> set up folder hooks for all the folders which is a bit cumbersome.
Please ignore my ques
39 matches
Mail list logo
